Case ID:217531

Kizito v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E015 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 3153 (KLR) (12 April 2023) (Ruling)

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Miscellaneous Criminal Application E015 of 2023

Parties:

Kizito v Republic

Date Delivered:

12 Apr 2023

Case Class:

Court:

High Court at Kisumu

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Roselyne Ekirapa Aburili

Citation:

Kizito v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E015 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 3153 (KLR) (12 April 2023) (Ruling)

County:

Kisumu

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

Kizito v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E015 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 3153 (KLR) (12 April 2023) (Ruling)

Neutral citation:

[2023] KEHC 3153 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Kisumu

Miscellaneous Criminal Application E015 of 2023

RE Aburili, J

April 12, 2023

Between

Fredrick Kizito

Applicant

and

Republic

Respondent

Ruling

1.

The Applicant herein Fredrick Kizito was convicted and sentenced to serve fifteen (15) years imprisonment for the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 of the

Penal Code

vice HCR No 50 of 2003 at Kisumu.

2.

He now claims that he was aged 17 years when he was sentenced and that he is now reformed and trained in life’s skills as shown by the annexed certificates.

3.

I have perused the documents annexed. Among them is a warrant of committal to prison dated March 10, 2006. The Petitioner was sentenced to death and vide Kisumu High Court Petition No 49 of 2019, he was resentenced to serve fifteen (15) years imprisonment.

4.

The fifteen (15) years imprisonment was to run from June 18, 2019. The Applicant having been resentenced by the court of competent, concurrent jurisdiction, this court has no power to resentence or reduce the imposed sentence further.

5.

Further, vide the order dated February 15, 2022, FA Ochieng J, (as he then was) stated as follows: -

“

It is ordered that when the prison authorities are calculating the period which the application is to spend when serving sentence, should take into account the three (3) years, six (6) months and 9 days which he spent in custody during trial.”

6.

The Convict has already benefited from resentencing. I find this application misplaced and a total lie that he was aged 17 years old. It is hereby dismissed.

7.

This file is hereby closed.

8.

Orders accordingly.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 12

TH

DAY OF APRIL, 2023

R. E. ABURILI

JUDGE