Case ID:206791

Letaari & 2 others (Suing as Legal Representative of the Estate of Ntaari Kilenyi Supeyo) v Kariuki & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 40 of 2020) [2022] KEELC 14637 (KLR) (8 November 2022) (Ruling)

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Environment & Land Case 40 of 2020

Parties:

Letaari & 2 others (Suing as Legal Representative of the Estate of Ntaari Kilenyi Supeyo) v Kariuki & 3 others

Date Delivered:

08 Nov 2022

Case Class:

Court:

Environment and Land Court at Kajiado

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Maxwell Nduiga Gicheru

Citation:

Letaari & 2 others (Suing as Legal Representative of the Estate of Ntaari Kilenyi Supeyo) v Kariuki & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 40 of 2020) [2022] KEELC 14637 (KLR) (8 November 2022) (Ruling)

County:

Kajiado

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

Letaari & 2 others (Suing as Legal Representative of the Estate of Ntaari Kilenyi Supeyo) v Kariuki & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 40 of 2020) [2022] KEELC 14637 (KLR) (8 November 2022) (Ruling)

Neutral citation:

[2022] KEELC 14637 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the Environment and Land Court at Kajiado

Environment & Land Case 40 of 2020

MN Gicheru, J

November 8, 2022

Between

Daniel Kisheu Letaari

1

st

Applicant

Victor Rumpas Letaari

2

nd

Applicant

Joshua Sancha Letaari

3

rd

Applicant

Suing as Legal Representative of the Estate of Ntaari Kilenyi Supeyo

and

George Ngure Kariuki

1

st

Respondent

Samuel Kuntai Tunai

2

nd

Respondent

Registrar of Lands, Ngong

3

rd

Respondent

County Government of Kajiado

4

th

Respondent

Ruling

1.

This ruling is on the notice of motion dated February 1, 2022, which is brought under article 162 (2) (b) of the

Environment and Land Court Act

and section 68 of the

Land Registration Act

, order 51, rule 1 of the

Civil Procedure Rules

and sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the

Civil Procedure Act

.

2.

The motion seeks to strike out the plaintiffs’ notice of withdrawal of the suit dated November 24, 2021 and set aside its orders issued on December 20, 2021 withdrawing the substantive suit herein and to reinstate the suit. Secondly, the motion seeks leave to have the plaintiffs’ amend their plaint and set the suit down for a pre trial conference.

3.

The grounds for seeking the above orders can be summarized as follows. The withdrawal of the suit was conditional. The condition was that the second defendant would pay the plaintiffs a total of Kshs 7 Million before the withdrawal of the suit. The second defendant has reneged on this condition by refusing to pay the agreed sum. The plaintiffs’ counsel has filed a supporting affidavit dated 1/2/2022 elaborating on the details of change of mind by the second defendant.

4.

The application is said to he opposed by the first defendant who is said to have filed a replying affidavit dated February 1, 2022. I have not seen the said affidavit on record. The only filing by the first defendant is a copy of written submissions dated October 8, 2022 and filed on October 11, 2022.

5.

I have carefully considered the application in its entirety and I am in agreement with the first defendant’s counsel that a withdrawal of a suit leaves no room for the reinstatement of the same suit through an application such as the current one. The only option left for the plaintiffs is to file a fresh suit. Order 25 (1)

Civil Procedure Rules

sets down that option of a fresh suit. For this reason, I dismiss the notice of motion dated 1/2/2022 with costs to the respondents.

DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT KAJIADO THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022.

M.N. GICHERU

JUDGE