Case ID:206056

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Opembe & 18 others v Associated Construction Co Ltd (Cause 225 of 2016) [2022] KEELRC 13035 (KLR) (2 November 2022) (Judgment)

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Cause 225 of 2016

Parties:

Opembe & 18 others v Associated Construction Co Ltd

Date Delivered:

02 Nov 2022

Case Class:

Court:

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu

Case Action:

Judgment

Judge(s):

S Radido

Citation:

Opembe & 18 others v Associated Construction Co Ltd (Cause 225 of 2016) [2022] KEELRC 13035 (KLR) (2 November 2022) (Judgment)

Advocates:

M. Kiveu Advocates for Claimants, Onsongo & co. Advocates for Respondent

Court Division:

Employment and Labour

County:

Kisumu

Advocates:

M. Kiveu Advocates for Claimants, Onsongo & co. Advocates for Respondent

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

Opembe & 18 others v Associated Construction Co Ltd (Cause 225 of 2016) [2022] KEELRC 13035 (KLR) (2 November 2022) (Judgment)

Neutral citation:

[2022] KEELRC 13035 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu

Cause 225 of 2016

S Radido, J

November 2, 2022

Between

Maxwel Opembe

1

st

Claimant

Joseph Obuchere

2

nd

Claimant

James Mweu

3

rd

Claimant

Patrick Obuchere

4

th

Claimant

Benson Alieli

5

th

Claimant

Joash Opamo

6

th

Claimant

Evans Lwangu

7

th

Claimant

Kavuye Nelson

8

th

Claimant

Amos Okutoyi

9

th

Claimant

Francis Namayi

10

th

Claimant

James Ashioya

11

th

Claimant

Isaya Adede

12

th

Claimant

Laban Ouma

13

th

Claimant

Enos Ekkube

14

th

Claimant

Dominic Musembi

15

th

Claimant

Simon Olutekha

16

th

Claimant

Charles Shikanda

17

th

Claimant

Geoffrey Nyangau

18

th

Claimant

Isaya Okinda

19

th

Claimant

and

Associated Construction Co Ltd

Respondent

Judgment

1.

The Claimants sued the Respondent on 2 August 2016, and they stated the Issue in Dispute as:

Payment of final dues to the employees (Claimants) of the Respondent to Kshs 1,745,823/-.

2.

The Respondent filed a Response on 3 June 2022, and the Cause was heard on 27 June 2022, when one of the Claimants testified.

3.

The Respondent opted to close its case without leading any evidence.

4.

Pursuant to Court directions, the Claimants filed their submissions on 18 August 2022. The Respondent filed its submissions on 5 July 2022.

5.

The Claimants identified the Issues for determination as:

i.

Whether the Claimants were declared redundant by the actions of the Respondent?

ii.

What reliefs are the Claimants entitled?

iii.

Whether the Claimants have proved to the satisfaction of the Court the claims as set out in the Claim Statement?

iv.

Whether the Respondent's Defence should be struck out?

v.

Who should pay the costs?

6.

The Respondent outlined the Issues as follows:

i.

What is the nature of the Claim by the Claimants?

ii.

Who bears the burden of proof, and to what standard?

iii.

Have the Claimants proved their claims to the required standard?

iv.

Are the Claimants or any one of them entitled to the claims set out in the Memorandum of Claim?

v.

Who bears the costs of this Cause?

7.

The Court has considered the pleadings, evidence, and submissions.

8.

The cause of action by the Claimants was a breach of contract/statute (failure to pay terminal dues upon declaration of redundancies).

9.

The dues sought by the Claimants were 2 months’ salary in lieu of notice, tool allowance, leave allowance, 56 days’ pay during January, February and March 2016 and September 2013 salary arrears.

10.

The Claimants also prayed for the Respondent to be ordered to issue them with Certificates of Service and

PAYE

(P9) forms.

Certificates of Service(s)

11.

A certificate of service is a statutory entitlement under section 31 of the

Employment Act

, 2007, and the Respondent should issue each of the Claimants with a Certificate of Service within 30-days.

PAYE (P9) forms

12.

An employer is under a legal obligation to issue its employees with P9 forms for purposes of making annual tax returns.

13.

The Respondent should provide the Claimants with their copies of P9(s) as may be applicable or appropriate.

Salary in lieu of notice

14.

The Claimants did not place before the Court any evidential, contractual, or legal basis for the claim for the equivalent of 2 months’ salary in lieu of notice and relief is declined (the Court notes that in the submissions, the Claimants made a pitch for 1-month salary in lieu of notice).

Tool allowance

15.

The Claimant, who testified on behalf of the other Claimants, conceded that the Respondent used to pay tool allowance, and nothing, therefore, turns on this head of the claim.

Leave allowance, salary arrears and other dues.

16.

The Claimants demanded Kshs 1,745,823/- but the exact particulars of how the sum was arrived at were not disclosed.

17.

However, the correspondence between the parties produced in Court shows that the Respondent had admitted owing Kshs 917,767/- (see letters dated 14 May 2016 and 28 June 2016), and the Claimants admitted receiving a down payment of Kshs 365,000/- leaving a balance of Kshs 552,799/-.

18.

The Court will allow this head of admitted balance.

Limitation

19.

The Respondent raised a plea of a time-bar in its defence but did not address the same in the submissions.

20.

The Court considers the plea as having been abandoned.

Conclusion and Orders

21.

The Court enters judgment for the Claimants as follows:

i.

Certificates of Service(s) to be issued within 30 days.

ii.

PAYE

(P9) forms to be provided within 30 days where applicable.

iii.

The admitted sum of Kshs 552,799/- to be paid within 30 days.

22.

The award in 21(iii) above to attract interest at court rates from the date of filing the Memorandum of Claim if not paid within 30 days.

23.

The Claimants to have costs.

DELIVERED VIRTUALLY FROM MOMBASA, DATED AND SIGNED ON THIS 2

ND

DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022.

RADIDO STEPHEN, MCIARB

JUDGE

Appearances

For Claimants M. Kiveu Advocates

For Respondent Onsongo & co. Advocates

Court Assistant Chrispo Aura/Everlyne Nyaboke

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Cause 225 of 2016', 'Parties:': 'Opembe & 18 others v Associated Construction Co Ltd', 'Date Delivered:': '02 Nov 2022', 'Case Class:': '', 'Court:': 'Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu', 'Case Action:': 'Judgment', 'Judge(s):': 'S Radido', 'Citation:': 'Opembe & 18 others v Associated Construction Co Ltd (Cause 225 of 2016) [2022] KEELRC 13035 (KLR) (2 November 2022) (Judgment)', 'Advocates:': 'M. Kiveu Advocates for Claimants, Onsongo & co. Advocates for Respondent', 'Court Division:': 'Employment and Labour', 'County:': 'Kisumu', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}