Case ID:201422

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Chemonges v Musiwa & another (Civil Case 1 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 12411 (KLR) (Civ) (28 July 2022) (Ruling)

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Civil Case 1 of 2022

Parties:

Chemonges v Musiwa & another

Date Delivered:

28 Jul 2022

Case Class:

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Aggrey Otsyula Muchelule

Citation:

Chemonges v Musiwa & another (Civil Case 1 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 12411 (KLR) (Civ) (28 July 2022) (Ruling)

Court Division:

Civil

County:

Nairobi

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

Chemonges v Musiwa & another (Civil Case 1 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 12411 (KLR) (Civ) (28 July 2022) (Ruling)

Neutral citation:

[2022] KEHC 12411 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Civil

Civil Case 1 of 2022

AO Muchelule, J

July 28, 2022

In the matter of the estate of Jennifer

Kusuro Musiwa (Deceased)

Between

Rashid Hassan Chemonges

Applicant

and

Tony Musiwa

1

st

Respondent

Lucy Nyathika

2

nd

Respondent

Ruling

1.

This matter was originated by way of a plaint dated 26

th

January 2022 by Rashid Hassan Chemonges (the plaintiff/applicant) against Tony Musiwa and Lucy Nyathika (the respondents/respondents) alleging that the latter had intermeddled with and/or illegally taken away the property belonging to the estate of the deceased Jennifer Kusuro Musiwa who died on 17

th

April 2019. The properties were enumerated. The prayers were a declaration that the respondents had intermeddled with the estate property; an order for the return of the taken property and; an order of permanent injunction to stop the interference. The applicant pleaded that he was one of the administrators of the estate of the deceased and that the interference with, and taking away of, the estate of the deceased was without the authority of the administrators.

2.

With the suit was a notice of motion seeking restraining orders against the respondents.

3.

This dispute was filed in the High Court Civil Division. Justice Sergon of the Division on 1

st

February 2022 noted that his was a matter for this Division and transferred it accordingly.

4.

Because of the reference to a grant by letters of administration intestate issued by this court in respect of the estate of the deceased Jennefer Kusuro Musiwa, I called for and checked the Succession Cause No. E1119 of 2021 in respect of the grant. It is evident that the applicant was one of the four petitioners to whom the grant was issued on 25

th

October 2021. In the succession cause the 1

st

respondent in summons dated 26

th

November 2021 has sought the revocation of the grant that was issued to the petitioners including the applicant. He claimed to be a son to the deceased and beneficiary of her estate; and that the grant was fraudulently issued to the petitioners without reference to him. On 30

th

May 2022 Justice Achode (PJ) who is seized of the matter directed that the summons for the revocation of the grant be heard in open court on 7

th

and 14

th

November 2022.

5.

It is also notable that in the succession cause, there is an application dated 16

th

March 2022 by the applicant against the 1

st

respondent seeking that, among other things, he should be restrained from interfering with the estate of the deceased. The 1

st

respondent has filed a replying affidavit. The application was on record when the court directed that it would hear the summons for the revocation of the grant.

6.

It is clear to me that the substantive dispute between the parties in the instant application is before the Succession Court in Succession Cause No. E1198 of 2021. The grant that is the basis of the applicant’s complaint in the instant proceedings has been questioned in the succession cause and the court therein is already inquiring into that grant. For the proper administration of justice, and so that there is no likelihood of embarrassment in case conflicting orders are given, I order that this application be mentioned by the Judge in Succession Cause No. E1198 of 2021 on 7

th

November 2022 for further directions.

7.

Costs be in the cause.

DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 28

TH

DAY OF JULY 2022.

A.O. MUCHELULE

JUDGE

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Civil Case 1 of 2022', 'Parties:': 'Chemonges v Musiwa & another', 'Date Delivered:': '28 Jul 2022', 'Case Class:': '', 'Court:': 'High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)', 'Case Action:': 'Ruling', 'Judge(s):': 'Aggrey Otsyula Muchelule', 'Citation:': 'Chemonges v Musiwa & another (Civil Case 1 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 12411 (KLR) (Civ) (28 July 2022) (Ruling)', 'Court Division:': 'Civil', 'County:': 'Nairobi', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}