Case ID:201336

Republic v Kabena (Criminal Case E003 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 12363 (KLR) (16 June 2022) (Ruling)

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Case E003 of 2022

Parties:

Republic v Kabena

Date Delivered:

16 Jun 2022

Case Class:

Court:

High Court at Kiambu

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Rachel Biomondo Ngetich

Citation:

Republic v Kabena (Criminal Case E003 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 12363 (KLR) (16 June 2022) (Ruling)

Advocates:

Mr. Seda for State

County:

Kiambu

Advocates:

Mr. Seda for State

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

Republic v Kabena (Criminal Case E003 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 12363 (KLR) (16 June 2022) (Ruling)

Neutral citation:

[2022] KEHC 12363 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Kiambu

Criminal Case E003 of 2022

RB Ngetich, J

June 16, 2022

Between

Republic

Prosecution

and

Brian Waweru Kabena

Accused

Ruling

1.

The accused herein Brian Waweru Kabena was charged with the offence of Murder Contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the

Penal Code

.

2.

Particulars are that on the 31

st

day of December, 2021 and the 1

st

day of January, 2022 at Munyinyi area of Ndenderu in Kiambaa sub-county within Kiambu County murdered Everlyne Wanjiru Waweru.

3.

The substance of the charge and the particulars were read over to the accused on 26

th

January 2021. The accused denied the charges and a plea of not guilty was entered. Mr. Sede counsel for the accused applied to have the accused released on bond.

4.

The State counsel Mr. Gacharia indicated that the state was not opposed to the accused being granted bond/bail.

5.

The court called for a pre- bail report. The report was filed on 9

th

March 2022. I have perused the report. The victim’s family is opposed to the accused being granted bail. The father of the victim indicates the accused is not a first time offender. The accused was charged with the offence of assault but was released on a fine and proceeded to kill the victim within 2 months. The family feels the accused is a risk flight and poses a security threat to the family of the victim.

6.

The mother of the accused who lives in abroad is willing to support the accused and procure his attendance in court. The aunt who lives with the accused has indicated she is willing to help the accused and secure his attendance in court.

7.

The local administration of Ndenderu referred to the accused and the victim as alcoholics. They are not aware of any criminal record for the accused person. It was also pointed out that the accused lacks proper parental care and is of the view that if the bond is granted the accused will lack any guidance.

8.

From the report,the deceased was in a relationship with the accused. The accused admits to having committed an assault on her. The father of the deceased has raised a concern that the accused had issued threats to the deceased’s sister for interfering with their relationship.

9.

I have noted the concern of the local administration. The accused lacks parental care. The mother lives in the USA and it is unlikely that she will be able to avail the accused to attend court when required. From the report, the father indicated that he threatened the deceased’s sister against interfering with their relationship.

10.

No affidavit has been filed to oppose bond but in addition to the fact that they may not be a closer person to ensure that accused attends court when required, from the report compiled by the probation officer, there are high chances that the accused may threaten witnesses if released.

11.

In my view,it will not be safe to release the accused at this stage of trial. I am of the view that the matter be fastracked

Final Orders

1.

Application for bond is hereby dismissed.

2.

Accused may renew bond application in the event circumstances change.

RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED VIRTUALLY AT KIAMBU THIS 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022

...........................

RACHEL NGETICH

JUDGE

In the Presence of:

Kinyua – Court Clerk

Mr. Seda for Accused

Ms. Kihima holding brief for victims family