Case ID:185900

Patrick Asatsa v Republic [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Petition E018 of 2021

Parties:

Patrick Asatsa v Republic

Date Delivered:

15 Nov 2021

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Kakamega

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

William Musya Musyoka

Citation:

Patrick Asatsa v Republic [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Kakamega

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. E018 OF 2021

PATRICK ASATSA..............................PETITIONER

VERSUS

REPUBLIC.........................................RESPONDENT

RULING

1. This matter was placed before me for the purpose of giving directions, in view of the recent decision by the Supreme Court in

Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic; Katiba Institute & 5 others

(

Amicus Curiae

[2021] (Koome CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ibrahim, Wanjala, Ndung’u & Lenaola SSJJ), with respect to mandatory sentences, where it was clarified that the decision, in

Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic

[2017] eKLR (Maraga CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ojwang, Wanjala, Njoki and Lenaola SCJJ), had arisen from proceedings relating to murder, under section 204 of the Penal Code, Cap 63, Laws of Kenya, and the position stated in the said decision was intended to apply only to mandatory sentences with respect to murder cases.

2. The filings before me are incredibly vague. I am unable to make out what the proceedings, leading up to the conviction of the petitioner for twenty years, related to. He has not filed a petition nor an application. What I see are supplementary grounds and submissions. He has not placed on record judgments of the trial court and the appellate courts. He has not disclosed the offence for which he was convicted.

3. The state of the filings is that no determination can be made at all on review of the sentence. No directions can equally be given as to whether the court has jurisdiction under

Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic

[2017] eKLR (Maraga CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ojwang, Wanjala, Njoki and Lenaola SCJJ), in view of the directions given in

Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic; Katiba Institute & 5 others

(

Amicus Curiae

[2021] (Koome CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ibrahim, Wanjala, Ndung’u & Lenaola SSJJ). I shall accordingly strike out the cause on account of its being too vague and blurred for any sense to be made of it.

4. The Deputy Registrar shall cause copies of this ruling to be availed to the petitioner and the office of Director of Public Prosecutions, Kakamega.

PREPARED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KAKAMEGA THIS 1

5

TH

DAY OF NOVEMBER2021

W MUSYOKA

JUDGE