Case ID:185776

Julius Mwiti M’ringera v Festus Muriungi Naituri [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Miscellaneous Application Case E035 of 2021

Parties:

Julius Mwiti M’ringera v Festus Muriungi Naituri (Sued as the Legal Representative of the Estate of M’nairri M’rutere)

Date Delivered:

17 Nov 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Environment and Land Court at Meru

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Christopher Kyania Nzili

Citation:

Julius Mwiti M’ringera v Festus Muriungi Naituri [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Environment and Land

County:

Meru

Case Outcome:

Application dismissed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU

ELC MISC. APPLICATION CASE NO. E035 OF 2021

JULIUS MWITI M’RINGERA................................................................................................................................................PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

FESTUS MURIUNGI NAITURI (Sued as the legal representative of the estate of M’NAIRRI M’RUTERE............DEFENDANT

RULING

1. Through an application dated

17.8.2021

brought under

Section 1A, 1B and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules

and all other enabling provisions of the laws

Julius Mwiti M’Ringera

seeks for the transfer and disposal of

Githongo ELC No. E006/2021

to

Nanyuki Law Courts

.

2. The application is supported by affidavits sworn on

17.8.2021

and

22.9.2021

respectively.

3. The grounds are that suit relates to

Land L.R Laikipia/Daiga/Block 4/924 Nyariginu

. The trial court on 11.2.2021 noted the suit ought to have been filed within Nanyuki Law Courts in which the subject land is situated and that leave to file the suit out of time had also been granted at Nanyuki Law Courts.

4. It is not clear from the supporting affidavit why the applicant filed the suit in Githongo, yet the suit land is situated in Nanyuki.

5. There is no doubt the suit was filed in the wrong court contrary to

Sections 12, 15 and 16 of the Civil Procedure Act

. Under

Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act

, the High Court has powers to transfer a suit from one court to the other.

6. In

Equity Bank –vs- Bruce Mutie Mutuku T/A Diani Tours & Travel [2016] eKLR,

the Court of Appeal held it would be illegal for the High Court under

Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act

to transfer a suit filed in a court lacking jurisdiction to a court with jurisdiction and therefore sanctify an incompetent suit. This is because no competent suit exists that is capable of being transferred.

7. In

Mwangi Wamigwi –s- Simon Mbiriri Wanjiku & Another [2015] eKLR

it was held where a suit is instituted in a tribunal with no jurisdiction, such suit cannot be transferred under

Section 18

of the

Civil Procedure Act

to a tribunal where it ought to have been properly instituted, since such a suit is a nullity in law.

8. In the instant case the court with territorial jurisdiction was Nanyuki Law Courts. The only option and which the applicant has is to withdraw the suit so as to pave way for the filing of a fresh suit in a court competent to try it.

9. In the circumstances the application herein lacks merit and is dismissed with no orders as to costs.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS AT MERU THIS 17

TH

DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021

In presence of:

NO APPEARANCE FOR THE PARTIES

COURT ASSISTANT - KANANU

HON. C.K. NZILI

ELC JUDGE