Case ID:185631

Sivanus Ingosi Engoi v Republic [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Miscellaneous Criminal Application 46 of 2019

Parties:

Sivanus Ingosi Engoi v Republic

Date Delivered:

12 Nov 2021

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Kakamega

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

William Musya Musyoka

Citation:

Sivanus Ingosi Engoi v Republic [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Kakamega

Case Outcome:

Application allowed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT KAKAMEGA

MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 46 OF 2019

SIVANUS INGOSI ENGOI.....APPLICANT

VERSUS

REPUBLIC..........................RESPONDENT

RULING

1. This matter was placed before me for the purpose of giving directions, in view of the recent decision by the Supreme Court in

Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic; Katiba Institute & 5 others

(

Amicus Curiae

[2021] (Koome CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ibrahim, Wanjala, Ndung’u & Lenaola SSJJ), with respect to mandatory sentences, where it was clarified that the decision, in

Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic

[2017] eKLR (Maraga CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ojwang, Wanjala, Njoki and Lenaola SCJJ), had arisen from proceedings relating to murder, under section 204 of the Penal Code, Cap 63, Laws of Kenya, and the position stated in the said decision was intended to apply only to mandatory sentences with respect to murder cases.

2. The application herein, the undated Motion, filed on 4

th

July 2019, principally rides on the decision, in

Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic

[2017] eKLR (Maraga CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ojwang, Wanjala, Njoki and Lenaola SCJJ), for the applicant seeks rehearing with respect to the sentence imposed by the trial court, where he had been convicted of robbery with violence, under section 296(2) of the Penal Code, in Kakamega CMCCRC No. 2685 of 2004, and was sentenced to mandatory death. He filed appeals in Kakamega HCCRA No. 112 and 113 of 2006, which affirmed the conviction in Kakamega CMCCRC No. 2685 of 2004.

3. The offence, the subject of the instant proceedings, is not murder, but robbery with violence, as defined in section 296(2) of the Penal Code, the decision in

Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic

[2017] eKLR (Maraga CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ojwang, Wanjala, Njoki and Lenaola SCJJ), therefore, does not apply to it. As a consequence, the High Court has no jurisdiction to review the sentence that was imposed by the trial court, based on the decision in

Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic; Katiba Institute & 5 others

(

Amicus Curiae

[2021] (Koome CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ibrahim, Wanjala, Ndung’u & Lenaola SSJJ). Since there is no jurisdiction on my part to entertain the application, I shall strike it out, for it is incompetent. The said file shall be closed.

4. The Deputy Registrar shall cause copies of this ruling to be availed to the applicant and the office of Director of Public Prosecutions, Kakamega.

PREPARED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KAKAMEGA THIS 12

TH

DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021

W MUSYOKA

JUDGE