Case ID:185507

Minyua Gachuhi Mburu Ndua v Michael Ndiwa Kimtai [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Environment and Land Case 38 of 2017

Parties:

Minyua Gachuhi Mburu Ndua v Michael Ndiwa Kimtai

Date Delivered:

10 Nov 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Environment and Land Court at Kitale

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Fred Ongarora Nyagaka

Citation:

Minyua Gachuhi Mburu Ndua v Michael Ndiwa Kimtai [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Family

County:

Uasin Gishu

Case Outcome:

Application allowed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT

AT KITALE

LAND CASE NO. 38 OF 2017

MINYUA GACHUHI MBURU NDUA..................................APPLICANTS/PLAINTIFFS

VERSUS

MICHAEL NDIWA KIMTAI..............................................RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT

RULING

(

On authority of Court to order transfer of land directly to a Third Party rather than decree holders

)

1.

The First Plaintiffs/ Applicants moved this Court by way of a Notice of Motion dated

5/7/2021

and filed on

6/07/2021.

The Motion seeks the following reliefs:

(1) THAT this Honorable Court be pleased to order that Plot No. 56 Kapkoi Settlement Scheme be transferred and registered in the name of SARAH NJERI MWANIKI.

(2) THAT costs be provided for.

2.

The Application was brought under

Sections 1A, 1B, 3,3A

and

63

of the

Civil Procedure Act

and

Order 51 Rule 1

of the

Civil Procedure Rules

. It is supported by the grounds on the face of it and by the Affidavit of

Munyua Gachui

the first Applicant herein. The grounds are that the applicants purchased the land from the Respondent in

1991

; that on

3/12/2018

the court entered judgment in their favour for the parcel of land to be theirs and subsequently that it transferred to them; that the court ordered the respondent herein to transfer

Plot No. 56 Kapkoi Settlement Scheme

to the Applicants; that the Applicants were partners and had already shared partnership properties and this particular property was by that sharing of partnership proceeds given to the 1st Applicant; that prior to this, way back in

2005

, the First Applicant had sold the plot to one

Sarah Njeri Mwaniki

; that that took place on

5/5/2005

as exhibited by the agreement marked

annexture MG 4

; that it will save on expenses if the property is directly transferred to

Sarah Njeri Mwaniki

.

3.

The averments in the Supporting Affidavit expound the grounds of the application and give the history of the purchase and sale of the parcel of land in question. In summary, it is deponed that the Applicants who were then partners purchased the suit land on

19/10/1991

from the Respondent herein, as per the attached copy of the agreement of even date and marked as

annexture MG 1

; that on

1/3/1993

, the partnership came to an end and they (the Applicants) distributed the properties they had acquired together. That

Plot No. 56 Kapkoi

fell in the hands of the First Applicant as part of his share and was therefore retained by him, as evidenced by Annexture

MG 2

; that on the

5/5/2005,

he sold the plot to

Sarah Njeri Mwaniki

although it had not been transferred to him; that in

2017

they filed this matter against the Respondent herein; that the case was heard and finalized and was determined in the Applicants’ favour; that afterwards the Applicant instructed his advocate to file an application requesting the Deputy Registrar to sign all necessary documents to facilitate transfer of the Plot to them which was allowed; that the discharge of charge has been, at the time of making this Application, signed by the Deputy Registrar. The Applicant therefore prays that

Plot No. 56 Kapkoi Settlement Scheme

be transferred and registered in the name of

Sarah Njeri Mwaniki

in his place so as to save on costs; further that the said

Sarah Njeri Mwaniki

has been in occupation of the suit land for a very long period of time and he has no interest on the suit land.

4.

The application is unopposed. There is neither a replying affidavit nor grounds of opposition on record by the respondent to controvert the Applicants’ averments.

Submissions

5.

On the

12/10/2021,

the Honourable court directed that the application be heard by way of written submissions. It directed Ms. Munialo, counsel for the Applicant, to file submissions on behalf the Applicants within

7 days

from that date. Counsel did so on the

21/10/2021

.

Analysis and Determination

6.

I have carefully considered the Application, the Supporting Affidavit and the submissions filed on behalf of the Applicants. Although the application is unopposed, the court has the duty to determine the Application on merit. Thus, I have formulated one issue to determine on the Application. The issue is:

Whether justice demands that the land be transferred to one Sarah Njeri Mwaniki.

7.

As I have stated above, the application is unopposed. It is trite law that he who alleges must prove. It is therefore upon the Applicants herein to give reasons to the satisfaction of the court as to why the suit land ought to be transferred to the said

Sarah Njeri Mwaniki

.

8.

For the reasons above, a brief history of what transpired before the instant Application is vital and worth repeating. The Applicants, one

Munyua Gachui

(

hereinafter known as the

1

st

Applicant)

and one

Mburu Ndua

(

hereinafter known as the

2

nd

applicant)

were business partners prior to

1/03/1993.

During the lifetime of the partnership they acquired assets jointly. One of the assets was Land Parel

No.

Plot 56 Kapkoi

Settlement Scheme. They jointly purchased the suit land from the defendant. What was and has been pending all along was the transfer of that plot known as

Plot No. 56 Kapkoi Settlement Scheme

from the seller. They instituted this suit against the Respondent/Defendant for a declaration that the suit land belongs to them, and that the Defendant had no proprietary interest in it. Int the alternative they prayed for an order that the trust created by virtue of the land being registered in the name of the Defendant does terminate and the title deed issued to him be cancelled and a new one be issued in their names and the register be rectified accordingly. They also prayed for an order of injunction restraining the Defendant, his agents and/or servants from transferring and registering the land into his name. On

3/12/2018

judgment was entered in their favour as against the Defendant as prayed.

9.

Later on, the plaintiffs filed an Application dated

17/1/2020

for the orders that the Honourable Court does direct the Deputy Registrar to sign the relevant documents on behalf of the Respondent/Defendant to facilitate the transfer of

Plot No. 56 (the suit land herein)

to the Applicants/Plaintiffs. The Application was allowed on

19/02/2020

. Annexture

MG 7

shows that on

27/5/2021,

the Deputy Registrar of this Court signed the Discharge of Charge in respect of the Plot - namely

Kwanza District/Kapkoi/56

.

10.

The above processes yielded the instant application. Rather than the First Applicant having the land transferred and registered in his name, he has now opted to have it transferred to one

Sarah Njeri Mwaniki,

the subsequent purchaser from him. It is the 1

st

Applicants’ contention that although they purchased properties jointly with the 2

nd

applicant, they shared out the properties upon termination of the partnership. This was evidence in the supporting Affidavit as stated above. He annexed to the Affidavit a copy of the sale agreement dated

19/10/1991

showing their joint purchase enterprise. In addition, he also annexed thereto evidence of the sharing of the properties by way of a partnership assets’ distribution agreement dated

1/3/1993.

The agreement reveals that indeed the suit land herein

Plot No. 56 Kapkoi Settlement Scheme

(among other properties not the subject matter of this suit) was to remain in the sole ownership of

Dr. Munyua Gachuhi -

the 1

st

Applicant herein. Furthermore, the Applicant has annexed a copy of agreement of sale of the land between himself and one

Sarah Njeri Mwaniki.

The agreement is dated

5/5/2005

. As the Second Plaintiff Applicant does not dispute any of the facts deponed to by the Plaintiff, and the Court having found judgment in their favour in respect of the Plot in issue, I find that the Applicant has established a case for the need of the Court to order a direct transfer of the property to another party other than him

.

11.

In my considered view, the applicants’ application has been brought in good faith. It is not tainted by any fraud, malice, ill will or illegality. The Applicants have proved that the sole intention and purpose of the application is to accord the subsequent purchaser of that land what is lawfully and rightfully hers - the proprietary interest in it. As neither the 2

nd

Applicant nor the Defendant has raised any issue with regard to having the land being transferred to one

Sarah Njeri Mwaniki,

I find that the applicants have proved that they deserve the orders prayed for.

12.

In the conclusion, and in the interest of justice, basing my discretion on the provisions in which the application was brought, I find that the application dated

5/7/2021

is meritorious and is hereby allowed in terms of

Prayer No. 1

. For avoidance of doubt, the Deputy Registrar of this Court is hereby authorized to execute all transfer documents in relation to

Kwanza District/Kapkoi/56

situate in

Kapkoi Settlement Scheme

in favour of

Sarah Njeri Mwaniki

for registration in her name, upon payment of the requisite stamp duty and other payments that may be due to Government and other bodies for that purpose. Costs shall be in the cause.

It is so ordered.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KITALE VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL ON THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021

.

DR.

IUR

FRED NYAGAKA

JUDGE, ELC, KITALE.