Case ID:185469

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


James Kibet Chirchir v Republic [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Revision E160 of 2021

Parties:

James Kibet Chirchir v Republic

Date Delivered:

11 Nov 2021

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Mombasa

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Anne Colleta Apondi Ong’injo

Citation:

James Kibet Chirchir v Republic [2021] eKLR

Advocates:

Mr. Okach for Applicant’s Advocate

Ms. Kambaga for Respondent’s Advocate

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Mombasa

Advocates:

Mr. Okach for Applicant’s Advocate

Ms. Kambaga for Respondent’s Advocate

History Advocates:

Both Parties Represented

Case Outcome:

Application dismissed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT MOMBASA

HCCR. REV. NO. E160 OF 2021

JAMES KIBET CHIRCHIR....APPLICANT

-VERSUS-

REPUBLIC............................RESPONDENT

R U L I N G

1. The application dated 16

th

of September, 2021 was brought pursuant to Articles 48, 49 and 50 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 seeking:-

i. That the proceedings in Shanzu CMC Criminal Case No. 969 of 2021 be removed and brought to the High Court for purposes of ascertaining the legality, correctness and/or propriety of the proceedings and ruling of the lower court.

ii. The court exercises its discretion in revision of the ruling on bail and bond by the lower court wherein the Magistrate granted unreasonable bail and bond terms.

iii. The court be pleased to set aside the bail and bond orders made and admit the Applicant to bail or bond on reasonable terms.

iv. Costs of the application be provided for.

2. The application is supported by the affidavit of James Kiber Chirchir and the grounds on the face of the application which are to the effect that the bail and bond terms that were set by the court are not reasonable and the trial Magistrate failed to consider submissions by the counsel that the Applicant has a Constitutional right to be released on bail or bond on reasonable terms.

3. The Applicant averred that the court failed to take into cognizance the presumption of innocence and that bail ought not to be used as a punishment. It is further averred that if this court does not intervene, the Applicant stands to suffer further violation of his Constitutional rights and will continue to languish in custody having been condemned to bail terms that are unreasonable.

4. The Respondents were served with the applications on 18

th

of October, 2021 and they were given 7 days to file their affidavit and concurrently with written submissions and a date for ruling set on 11

th

of November, 2021. The Applicant was also instructed to file his submission within the same period.

5. As at the time of writing this ruling, the Respondent had not filed a Replying Affidavit or written submissions, neither had the Applicant filed his written submissions. As it stands, the application is not opposed but equally the Applicant has not filed written submissions to tell this court what illegality, error or impropriety is in the proceedings and ruling of the lower court to warrant an order for revision.

6. The orders of the trial Magistrate granting bond were an exercise of discretion and can only lie for review through the filing of a miscellaneous application or appeal.

7. The application herein does not have merit and the same is dismissed.

8. Orders accordingly.

JUDGMENT DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT THIS 11

TH

DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021

HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJO

JUDGE

In the presence of:-

Ogwel- Court Assistant

Applicant - Present in person

Mr. Okach for Applicant’s Advocate

Ms. Kambaga for Respondent’s Advocate

Hon. Lady Justice Anne Ong’injo

Judge

MR. OKATCH

I wish to apply to review. We relied on our affidavit which was extensive.

Hon. Lady Justice Anne Ong’injo

Judge

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Criminal Revision E160 of 2021', 'Parties:': 'James Kibet Chirchir v Republic', 'Date Delivered:': '11 Nov 2021', 'Case Class:': 'Criminal', 'Court:': 'High Court at Mombasa', 'Case Action:': 'Ruling', 'Judge(s):': 'Anne Colleta Apondi Ong’injo', 'Citation:': 'James Kibet Chirchir v Republic [2021] eKLR', 'Advocates:': 'Mr. Okach for Applicant’s Advocate\n\nMs. Kambaga for Respondent’s Advocate', 'Court Division:': 'Criminal', 'County:': 'Mombasa', 'History Advocates:': 'Both Parties Represented', 'Case Outcome:': 'Application dismissed', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}