Case ID:185439
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
Patrick Ndunde v Republic [2021] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Criminal Petition 6 of 2020
Parties:
Patrick Ndunde v Republic
Date Delivered:
12 Nov 2021
Case Class:
Criminal
Court:
High Court at Kakamega
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
William Musya Musyoka
Citation:
Patrick Ndunde v Republic [2021] eKLR
Court Division:
Criminal
County:
Kajiado
Case Outcome:
File closed
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6 OF 2020
PATRICK NDUNDE
...................................................................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
REPUBLIC
.................................................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This matter was placed before me for the purpose of giving directions, in view of the recent decision by the Supreme Court in
Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic; Katiba Institute & 5 others
(
Amicus Curiae
[2021] (Koome CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ibrahim, Wanjala, Ndung’u & Lenaola SSJJ), with respect to mandatory sentences, where it was clarified that the decision, in
Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic
[2017] eKLR (Maraga CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ojwang, Wanjala, Njoki and Lenaola SCJJ), had arisen from proceedings relating to murder, under section 204 of the Penal Code, Cap 63, Laws of Kenya, and the position stated in the said decision was intended to apply only to mandatory sentences with respect to murder cases.
2. The petition herein, undated and filed herein on an unknown date, principally rides on the decision, in
Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic
[2017] eKLR (Maraga CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ojwang, Wanjala, Njoki and Lenaola SCJJ), for the petitioner seeks review of his sentence, where he had been convicted of robbery with violence, under section 296(2) of the Penal Code, in Kakamega CMCCRC No. 3120 of 2007, and was sentenced to death, later commuted to life imprisonment by the President of the Republic of Kenya. He filed appeal in Kakamega HCCRA No. 134 of 2010 and Kisumu CACRA No. 57 of 2014, both of which were dismissed by the appellate court.
3. The offence, the subject of the instant proceedings, is not murder, but robbery with violence, as defined in section 296(2) of the Penal Code, the decision in
Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic
[2017] eKLR (Maraga CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ojwang, Wanjala, Njoki and Lenaola SCJJ), therefore, does not apply to it. As a consequence, the High Court has no jurisdiction to review the sentence that was imposed by the trial court, based on the decision in
Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic; Katiba Institute & 5 others
(
Amicus Curiae
[2021] (Koome CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ibrahim, Wanjala, Ndung’u & Lenaola SSJJ). Since there is no jurisdiction on my part to entertain the petition, I shall strike it out, for it is incompetent. The said file shall be closed.
4. The Deputy Registrar to cause copies of this ruling to be availed to the petitioner and the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions.
PREPARED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KAKAMEGA THIS 12
TH
DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
W MUSYOKA
JUDGE