Case ID:185221
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
In re Estate of Geoffrey Ngigi Ng’ang’a (Deceased) [2021] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Succession Cause 1596 of 2015
Parties:
In re Estate of Geoffrey Ngigi Ng’ang’a (Deceased)
Date Delivered:
22 Oct 2021
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Maureen Akinyi Odero
Citation:
In re Estate of Geoffrey Ngigi Ng’ang’a (Deceased) [2021] eKLR
Court Division:
Family
County:
Nairobi
Case Outcome:
Application dismissed
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 1596 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GEOFFREY NGIGI NG’ANG’A (DECEASED)
WINNIE WAHU NGANGA..........APPLICANT
VERSUS
IRENE WAMBUI NGIGI........RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Before this Court is summons dated
29
th
April 2021
which summons was amended on
15
th
June 2021
by which the Applicant
WINNIE WAHU NGANGA
seek the following orders: -
“(a)
SPENT
(b)
SPENT
(c )
THAT
the Respondent be and is hereby restrained by herself her employees servants or agents from collecting rent from the property known as
BLOCK A KISERIAN PLOT NO 83 B.
(d)
THAT the Respondent be and is hereby restrained by herself, her employees, servants or agents from humiliating, intimidating, harassing and threatening the tenants residing in the property known as BLOCK KISERIAN PLOT NO. 83B.
(e )
THAT the Respondent be and is hereby restrained by herself, her employees, servants or agents from humiliating, intimidating, harassing and threatening the Applicant, her employees, servants or agents in the course of managing and collecting rent from the tenants residing in the property known as BLOCK A KISERIAN PLOT NO. 83B.
(f)
THAT the Respondent be and is hereby restrained by herself, her employees, servants or agents from interfering with the ownership, possession and control of the property known as BLOCK A KISERIAN PLOT NO. 84B.
(g)
THAT the Respondent be and is hereby ordered to pay the Applicant all the monies received by her from December 2020 to date being rent collected by the Respondent from the property, BLOCK A KISERIAN PLOT NO. 83B.
(h)
THAT the officer Commanding Kiserian Police Station to enforce and assist in the compliance of the order.
(i)
Any other order which the Honourable court may deem fit to grant.
(j)
Costs of the Application be provided for.
2. The summons was premised upon
Section 47
of the
Law of Succession Act, Cap 160, Laws of Kenya Rules 49
of the
Probate & Administration Rules
and all enabling provision of the law and was supported by the Affidavit dated
29
th
April 2021
, sworn by
PETER NGANGA
one of the Administrators of the estate.
3. The Respondent
IRENE WAMBUI NGIGI
through her advocates
Messrs KARANJA & GISORE ADVOCATES
filed an Affidavit dated
21
st
May 2021
in opposition to the Application. The summons was canvassed by way of written submissions. The Applicants filed their written submissions dated
24
th
June 2021
whilst the Respondent relied on her written submissions
dated 21
st
June 2021.
BACKGROUND
4. This Succession Cause was filed in relation to the estate of
GEOFFREY
NGIGI NGANGA
(hereinafter ‘the Deceased’) who passed away intestate on
3
rd
April 2015
. The Deceased who was polygamous and had two wives was survived by the following –
1
st
House
Peter Nganga - son
James Mungai Ngigi - son
Stephen Mbugua Ngigi – son
Winnie Wahu Nganga – Daughter
2
nd
House
Irene Wambui Ngige – 2
nd
Wife
Peter Nganga Ngige – son
Charity Wanja Ngigi – Daughter
Winfred Wahu Ngigi – Daughter
Alicia Wambui Ngigi – Daughter
5. In the petition filed on
21
st
June 2015
seeking Grant of letters of Administration Intestate the inventory of the Deceased assets was given as follows –
“(a) Title No. Ngong/Ngong 45588
(b) LR No 4480/210 Ngong Town
(c ) LR No 4480/194 Ngong Town
(d) LR No. 305/101 B
(e ) Title No. Kajiado-Olchoro-Onyore 13999
(f) Motor vehicle Registration No KBJ 457R
(g) Motor vehicle Registration No. KBV 065X
(h) Motor vehicle Registration No. KAR 520K
(I) Account with Equity Bank Limited, Ngong Branch.
(j) Kiserian/Kiserian Plot 83B
”
6. On
25
th
September 2019
letters of Administration Intestate were issued to
PETER NGANGA, JAMES MUNGAI NGIGI, IRENE WAMBUI NGIGI
and
PETER NGANGA
as joint Administrators of the estate. On
25
th
November 2020
the letters of Administration were fully confirmed. The certificate confirmed grant indicated that the estate of the Deceased would be distributed as follows: -
Name
Description of Properties
Share of Heirs
Irene Wambui Ngigi
Block B Kiserian Plot No. 83B
Whole
James Mungai Ngige
LR No. 3429
LR No. 4480/194
Whole
Stephen Mbugua Ngigi
LR No. 4581
LR NO. 14140
Whole
Winnie Wahu Nganga
Block A Kiserian Plot No 83B
Lorry Registration No. KBJ 457J
Ngong/Ngong/45588
Whole
Peter Nganga
Title No. IR No 395 (LR No. 4480/210)
Whole
Alicia Wambui Ngigi
Winfred Wahu Ngigi
Charity Wanja Ngigi
Olochoronyore (3 acres)
Equally
Alicia Wambui Ngigi
Motor Vehicle Reg. No. KBV 856D
Whole
Winfred Wahu Ngigi
Motor Vehicle RAV4 Reg. No. KAR 520K
Whole
Charity Wanja Ngigi
Peter Nganga Ngige
Equity Bank Fund
Equally
Peter Nganga Ngige
Kiserian Posho Mill
Whole
7. The Applicants case is that notwithstanding the fact that she was allocated
BLOCK A KISERIAN PLOT NO. 83B
(hereinafter referred to as ‘
BLOCK A
’), and the Respondent was allocated
BLOCK B KISERIAN PLOT NO 83B
(hereafter referred to as
BLOCK B
) her attempt to take control of
Block A
has been rebuffed by the Respondent who has used force coercion, intimidation and violence in order to remain in control of the entire property. That the Respondent has all along been collecting rent from
Block A
which was allocated to the Applicant to the tune of roughly
Kshs 150,000
monthly.
8. The Applicant alleges that the Respondent has threatened and intimidated the tenants in
Block A
to pay the rent to her thereby causing loss to the Applicant. The Applicant submits that the certificate of confirmed Grant by which she was allocated
Block A
remains valued – it has neither been set aside nor revoked. That the actions of the Respondent amounts to contempt of court hence the present application.
9. The Respondent on her part states that there are no two properties known as
Block A Kiserian Plot 83B
and Blo
ck B Kisearin Plot NO. 83B
. The Respondent asserts that there is only one single property known as
KISERIAN PLOT NO. 83B
/
BUS
which is her matrimonial home and which she acquired and registered in her own name. That said property
does not
form part of the estate of the Deceased and could not therefore have been allocated to the Applicant. The Respondent states that the description of the property at
BLOCK A
and
BLOCK B
is a creation of the Applicant in an attempt to mislead the court.
10. The Respondent further alleges that the Grant was confirmed without her knowledge and/or involvement and states that she fully intends to challenge the confirmed Grant. That she only became aware that the Grant had been confirmed when the Applicant approached her tenants seeking to be paid rent. The Respondent urges the court to dismiss the application its entirety.
Analysis and Determination
11. I have carefully considered the summons before this court. The affidavit filed in rely thereto as well as the written submissions filed by both parties.
12. The Applicant herein is seeking declaratory orders with respect to
Block A
as well as orders to restrain the Respondent from collecting rent from said property. The orders which are being sought are final in nature and can only be granted after a full hearing at which evidence is called and parties are at liberty to cross-examine the witnesses.
13. The bone of contention is whether there exists two properties being
Block A
and
Block B
or whether as the Respondent asserts there is only one single property being
Kiserian Plot No 83/BUS
.
14. The certificate of confirmed Grant issued on
25
th
November 2020
refers to two distinct plots being
Block A Kiserian Plot No. 83B
and
Block B Kiserian Plot No 83B.
However, a certificate of official search dated
27
th
November 2015
refers to a
Plot No 83 BUS Kiserian
which is registered in the name of
Irene Wambui
the Respondent herein. The search indicates that said plot was transferred to the Respondent on
28
th
August 2013.
Yet another certificate of official search dated
23
rd
February 2016
refers to one property being
Plot No. 83B Kiserian
which is registered in the name of
Geoffrey Ngigi Nganga (the Deceased).
From the documents, it is difficult to determine the true status of the
Kiserian Plot
.
15. The question of whether there exists one plot or two separate plots and the question of who between the Applicant and the Respondent is entitled to the rental income arising therefrom are questions that cannot be determined on the basis of Affidavit evidence.
16. I do note that the Respondent has filed an application for review of Grant dated
6
th
July 2021
in which she seeks the removal of the property known as
Kiserian Plot No. 83/BUS
as an asset subject to distribution by the Administrators. The said application is yet to be heard. It is my view that these are matters that can be canvassed during the hearing of that summons for review of Grant.
17. In the circumstances I am not inclined to allow the present summons. The same is dismissed in its entirety. This being a family matter I make no orders on costs.
DATED IN NAIROBI THIS 22
ND
DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
…………………………………..
MAUREEN A. ODERO
JUDGE