Case ID:184922

Hadija Nanjala Chemiati v Jamin Wasike Chemiati& another; Gayani Enterprises (Interested Party) 2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Civil Suit 91 of 2005 (O.S)

Parties:

Hadija Nanjala Chemiati v Jamin Wasike Chemiati& Ramadhan Musumba Chemiati; Gayani Enterprises (Interested Party)

Date Delivered:

03 Nov 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Bungoma

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Stephen Nyangau Riechi

Citation:

Hadija Nanjala Chemiati v Jamin Wasike Chemiati& another; Gayani Enterprises (Interested Party) 2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Civil

County:

Bungoma

Case Outcome:

Application dismissed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUNGOMA

CIVIL SUIT NO. 91 OF 2005 (O.S)

HADIJA NANJALA CHEMIATI...........................................................PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

JAMIN WASIKE CHEMIATI............................................................DEFENDANT

AND

RAMADHAN MUSUMBA CHEMIATI..............................................APPLICANT

AND

GAYANI ENTERPRISES....................................................INTERESTED PARTY

RULING

The interested party in an application dated 24

th

November, 2020 seeks the following orders;-

1. That an order do issue directing that all the tenants on land parcel number Bungoma/Township/228 to deposit monthly rent in court pending the hearing and determination of this suit and other suits pending before the honouranle court touching on the suit parcels.

2. Costs.

The application is supported by the affidavit of Sarah Hersi Ali, one of the directors of the interested party. She depones that the suit parcel of land is registered in the interested party’s name and has several business with tenants who pay rent directly to the plaintiff which fact she depones is prejudicial to the interested party.

The applicant, Ramdhan Musumba Chemiati in response to the application filed a notice of preliminary objection dated 10/5/2021 raising the following grounds;

1. That the honourable court lacks the necessary jurisdiction to entertain the application.

2. That the application is an abuse of the court process.

The parties by consent agreed to dispose of the preliminary objection by way of written submissions. Both parties filed their submissions and the court reserved the ruling for 27/7/2021.

By way of letter dated 7/6/2021, the interested party’s counsel expressed his intention to withdraw the application subject of the ruling. The request to withdraw is hereby allowed. The interested party’s application dated 24/11/2020 is hereby dismissed. Each party to bear its own costs to the application.

DATED AT BUNGOMA THIS 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021

S. N. RIECHI

JUDGE