Case ID:184674

Protus Waswa v National Cereals and Produce Board [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Miscellaneous Civil Application 169 of 2019

Parties:

Protus Waswa v National Cereals and Produce Board

Date Delivered:

29 Oct 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Kakamega

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

William Musya Musyoka

Citation:

Protus Waswa v National Cereals and Produce Board [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Civil

County:

Kakamega

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

KAKAMEGA

MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 169 OF 2019

PROTUS WASWA

……………..……………….……...….……..APPLICANT

VERSUS

NATIONAL CEREALS AND PRODUCE BOARD

..…...…RESPONDENT

RULING

1. These proceedings commenced by way of Motion, dated 19

th

July 2019, for temporary stay of execution of a judgment delivered in an undisclosed suit, and leave to appeal out of time.

2. The applicant listed that application for hearing on 18

th

November 2019, but he was not available to argue it, so the same was dismissed for non-attendance and want of prosecution.

3. He then moved another application dated 3

rd

December 2019, seeking to have the application dated 19

th

July 2019 reinstated. That application was allowed on 18

th

February 2020, and the said application was reinstated.

4. The application dated 19

th

July 2019 was then fixed for hearing on 28

th

September 2020. The applicant was not present to prosecute it, and that application was once again dismissed for want of prosecution.

5. What I am called to determine is an application dated 7

th

October 2020, which seeks reinstatement of the dismissed applications. The principal application, dated 19

th

July 2019, is incredibly vague. It does not disclose the suit from which the judgment sought to be stayed was delivered. No document is attached to the supporting affidavit. There is no evidence whether the judgment emanated from a decision of the High Court or a magistrate’s court. If a magistrates court, it is not indicated which one, and in which suit. It would serve no purpose to reinstitute the said application, for no logical orders can ever be granted on it.

6. The application dated 7

th

October 2020 is hereby dismissed. The respondent shall have the costs. It is so ordered.

DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 29

th

DAY OF October 2021

W. MUSYOKA

JUDGE