Case ID:184638

Kenyan Alliance Insurance Company Limited v Musa Amalemba Werangai [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Civil Appeal E5 of 2020

Parties:

Kenyan Alliance Insurance Company Limited v Musa Amalemba Werangai

Date Delivered:

29 Oct 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Kakamega

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

William Musya Musyoka

Citation:

Kenyan Alliance Insurance Company Limited v Musa Amalemba Werangai [2021] eKLR

Case History:

(Being an appeal from the original judgment and decree of Hon. Noelyne Akee, Resident Magistrate, of 16th September 2020 in Kakamega CMCCC No. 192B of 2018)

Court Division:

Civil

County:

Kakamega

History Docket No:

CMCCC No. 192B of 2018

History Magistrate:

Hon. Noelyne Akee - RM

History County:

Kakamega

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA

CIVIL APPEAL NO. E5 OF 2020

(Being an appeal from the original judgment and decree of Hon. Noelyne Akee, Resident Magistrate, of 16

th

September 2020 in Kakamega CMCCC No. 192B of 2018)

KENYAN ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

................................APPELLANT

VERSUS

MUSA AMALEMBA WERANGAI........................................................................

RESPONDENT

RULING

1. What I am called upon to determine is the Motion, dated 4

th

February 2021, which seeks stay of execution of judgment and decree in Kakamega CMCCC No. 192B of 2018 pending appeal.

2. The trial court had on 16

th

September 2020 declined to set aside an

ex parte

judgment. The appellant had been served with summons to enter appearance, together with other accompanying documents. Rather than act on the documents, the same were filed away. The appellant argues that there was honest mistake, inadvertence and lack of lethargy. As a consequence, the appellant did not file defence, and judgment was entered against it.

3. The appeal herein turns on the said ruling of 16

th

September 2020. The trial court is said to have failed to find that the explanation by the appellant for failing to enter appearance was excusable; failed to find that failure to file defence was honest and unintentional; failed to find the delay in filing application to set aside was excusable, among others.

4. The trial court file was not made available to me, so I am unable to tell firsthand what transpired at the trial court. I have to rely on the record of appeal, which does not appear to be complete, for it does not have a copy of the affidavit of service with respect to service of the initial summons. The ruling itself is equally sketchy on what exactly transpired.

5. I believe justice of the situation militates in favour of the appellant getting stay of execution of the

ex parte

judgment, to facilitate appeal, so that they can have their day in court. As a condition, the entire judgment sum in Kakamega CMCCC No. 47 of 2014 shall be deposited in court within 14 days, in default of which the stay order shall lapse. The respondent shall have the costs.

6. It is so ordered.

DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021

W. MUSYOKA

JUDGE