Case ID:184576

Judith Anyango v Invesco Assurance Limited [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Civil Appeal 172 of 2018

Parties:

Judith Anyango v Invesco Assurance Limited

Date Delivered:

29 Oct 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Kakamega

Case Action:

Judgment

Judge(s):

William Musya Musyoka

Citation:

Judith Anyango v Invesco Assurance Limited [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Civil

County:

Kakamega

Case Outcome:

Appeal allowed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 172 OF 2018

(

An appeal arising from the judgment and decree of the Hon. W. Lopokoiyit,

Resident Magistrate (RM), in Kakamega CMCCC No. 312 of 2017, of 29

th

November 2018)

JUDITH ANYANGO............................................................APPELLANT

VERSUS

INVESCO ASSURANCE LIMITED..............................RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT

1. The suit at the trial court was initiated by the appellant herein against the respondent, for a declaratory order that the respondent, who had insured the accident vehicle in Kakamega CMCCC No. 203 of 2014, in favour of one Bernard Kariuki, was bound to satisfy the decree of the court made in that suit, to the tune of Kshs. 355, 643.00. At the trial, the appellant produced a police abstract to support his case, saying that the same bore a policy number, which was evidence that the accident vehicle had been covered by the respondent.

2. In the end, the trial court made a finding, that the only document that could prove existence of a contract of insurance was a certificate of insurance, and that since such evidnce was not brought forth, the case by the appellant had failed, and was dismissed. The appeal before me arose from that finding.

3. The appeal herein turns on only one issue, whether a police abstract can prove existence of a contract of insurance, or, put differently, whether the certificate of insurance was the only way to establish liability on the part of an insurer.

4. It was held, in

APA Insurance Co. Ltd vs. George Masele

[2014] eKLR (Mabeya J), that a police abstract was good enough, as evidence that there had been a policy of insurance in force, and that it was unreasonable to expect the injured victim to produce a certificate of insurance, given that he was not privy to the contract between the insured and the insurer, and that the details, as captured in the police abstract, are from the certificate of insurance affixed to a motor vehicle or supplied by the insured.

5. I agree entirely with

APA Insurance Co. Ltd vs. George Masele

[2014] eKLR (Mabeya J). The trial court need not have looked further than from the police abstract. The appellant had established on a balance, from the police abstract, that there was a valid insurance policy in force, and the burden shifted to the respondent to prove otherwise. See also

Martin Onyango vs. Invesco Asurance Company Limited

[2015] eKLR (Majanja J).

6. Consequently, it is my finding that the appeal herein has merit, and I hereby find in favour of the appellant. The order made, in Kakamega CMCCC No. 312 of 2017, dismissing the said suit, is hereby substituted with an order allowing the same in terms of prayers (a), (b) and (c) of the plaint, dated 7

th

July 2017. The appeal herein is allowed in those terms.

DELIVERED DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 29

TH

DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

W. MUSYOKA

JUDGE