Case ID:184360
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
In re Estate of Rachael Wambui Chege (Deceased) [2021] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Succession Cause 2668 of 2011
Parties:
In re Estate of Rachael Wambui Chege (Deceased)
Date Delivered:
27 Oct 2021
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Aggrey Otsyula Muchelule
Citation:
In re Estate of Rachael Wambui Chege (Deceased) [2021] eKLR
Court Division:
Civil
County:
Nairobi
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 2668 OF 2011
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF RACHAEL WAMBUI CHEGE - (DECEASED)
ROSE WANJIKU MUITE.................................1
ST
APPLICANT
SAMUEL KARANJA MWATHI......................2
ND
APPLICANT
JUSTUS KURIA MWATHI..............................3
RD
APPLICANT
FREDERICK CHEGE MWATHI....................4
TH
APPLICANT
CATHERINE WAIRIMU MWATHI...............5
TH
APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
TIMOTHY JOE MWATHI NJERI...............1
ST
RESPONDENT
COLLINS NDEGWA NJERI........................2
ND
RESPONDENT
EVA ANN WANGUI NJERI..........................3
RD
RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Deceased Rachael Wambui Chege died intestate on the 28
th
October 2011. In the affidavit sworn by the applicant Rose Wanjiku Muite on 6
th
August 2018 in support of the grant of letters of administration intestate, she indicated that she was the daughter of the deceased and that her siblings were Justus G. Kuria, Loise Njeri, Fredrick R. Chege, Ernest Gichuru Mwathi, Samuel P. Karanja and Catherine E. Wairimu. The applicant admits that Loise Njeri died and left three children who are the respondents Timothy Joe Mwathi, Collins Ndegwa Njeri and Eva Ann Wangui Njeri. The petition indicated that the deceased left the following property:-
(a) Muguga/Kanyariri/T.145;
(b) Dagoretti/Kinoo/883;
(c) Muguga/Kanyariri/796;
(d) Plot No.252 Mwihaki Farmers Co. Ltd; and
(e) Money at CBA - Account No. 647xxxxxxx.
She got the grant which was confirmed on 27
th
August 2013. She inherited the entire estate after consent to the application for confirmation was provided by Justus G. Kuria, Fredrick R. Chege, Ernest Gichuru Mwathi, Samuel P. Karanja and Catherine E. Wairimu.
2. Timothy Joe Mwathi Njeri, Collins Ndegwa Njeri and Eva Ann Wangui Njeri (the respondents) filed summons dated 14
th
September 2018 to revoke the grant. They complained that they had not been involved in the petition leading to the grant, their consent had not been sought or obtained and that they had consequently been disinherited. They were represented by Muumbi & Co. Advocates. The application was served but received no response. Justice Asenath Ongeri heard the application and allowed it on 2
nd
August 2019. The grant was revoked and the certificate of confirmation set aside. The property was ordered to revert to the deceased.
3. The applicant and her siblings filed an application dated 23
rd
June 2020 to set aside the orders of 2
nd
August 2019 on the basis that the respondents had not served them with the application for revocation. On the basis that the application had been served and had not elicited response, the same was allowed.
4. The present application by the applicant and her siblings seeks that the orders lodged against the suit properties be removed. Once again, the application was served and there was no response. I can see that Mr. Mugu advocate for the applicants says he served by sending an email to the respondents’ advocates. The applicants live in the U.S.A.
5. The legal position is that, now that the orders revoking the grant to the applicant were set aside because the applicant was not served with the application leading to the orders, the application became reinstated and the applicant and her siblings now are at liberty to respond to it so that it can be heard interpartes. This is the application dated 14
th
September 2018. The court has to determine the question whether or not the respondents were entitled to participate in the petition and the distribution of the estate of the deceased.
6. Under
section 47
of the
Law of Succession Act (Cap. 160)
and
rule 73
of the
Probate and Administration Rules
, and in order to do substantive justice to the parties, I give the applicant and her siblings 21 days to respond to the application for revocation, following which the matter shall be mentioned on
7
th
December 2021
for direction on hearing. Upon service within the response, the respondents shall within 14 days’ file any further affidavit.
7. I adjourn the application dated 29
th
April 2021.
8. I make no orders as to costs.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 27TH OCTOBER 2021.
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE