Case ID:183770

Francis Gitonga v Roy Parcel Services Limited [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Cause 2157 of 2016

Parties:

Francis Gitonga v Roy Parcel Services Limited

Date Delivered:

04 Oct 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Nzioki wa Makau

Citation:

Francis Gitonga v Roy Parcel Services Limited [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Employment and Labour Relations

County:

Nairobi

Case Outcome:

Preliminary objection dismissed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE EMPLOYMENT

&

LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA

AT NAIROBI

CAUSE NO. 2157 OF 2016

FRANCIS GITONGA................................................................................................CLAIMANT

VERSUS

ROY PARCEL SERVICES LIMITED...............................................................RESPONDENT

RULING

1. The Respondent through the Preliminary Objection dated 10

th

July, 2020 raises the matter of limitation. Counsel for the Respondent has articulated that the Claim which was filed on 13

th

October, 2016 is statute barred by dint of Section 90 of the Employment Act. She asserts that the cause of action arose on 11

th

October 2013 and being an employment dispute had 3 years limitation. She urges the disallowance of the suit for being limited and statute barred.

2. The Claimant did not file any opposition to the Objection and to boot are absent today despite being present in Court on 26

th

July 2021 when the Hon. Deputy Registrar of this Court set today for hearing of the Preliminary Objection.

3. The objection taken is well founded and Preliminary Objection in the case of

Mukisa Biscuit Manufactures Company Limited

v

West End Distributors [1968] EA 398

is that a Preliminary Objection may be raised where a question of limitation is in issue.

4. The Claimant’s cause of action occurred on 11

th

November 2013. By filing his Claim on 19

th

October 2016, he was within time as the limitation would have set on 11

th

November 2013 as the date the letter was clear he terminated his employ with Respondent as per the Memo from the Respondent. As such the limitation had not set in by the time of the filing of the suit. As such Preliminary Objection fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs since Claimant did not even attempt to oppose it.

5. Mention of the Cause on 19

th

October 2021 to obtain directions on the hearing of the suit. Notice to issue.

It is so ordered.

DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

NZIOKI WA MAKAU

JUDGE