Case ID:182471

Vincent Shinaka Muliro v Board of Trustees, National Social Security Fund & 2 others [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Petition E099 of 2021

Parties:

Vincent Shinaka Muliro v Board of Trustees,National Social Security Fund, Managing Trustee/CEO, National Social Security Fund & Attorney General

Date Delivered:

22 Sep 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Nzioki wa Makau

Citation:

Vincent Shinaka Muliro v Board of Trustees, National Social Security Fund & 2 others [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Employment and Labour Relations

County:

Nairobi

Case Outcome:

Petition dismissed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE EMPLOYMENT

&

LABOUR RELATIONS

COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

PETITION NO. E099 OF 2021

VINCENT SHINAKA MULIRO........................................PETITIONER/APPLICANT

VERSUS

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES,

NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY FUND....................................1

ST

RESPONDENT

THE MANAGING TRUSTEE/CEO,

NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY FUND...................................2

ND

RESPONDENT

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.....................................................3

RD

RESPONDENT

RULING

1. The long and short of the matter is that no merit is found in the Notice of Motion. The Court does recall the sequence of events on the material day when Mrs. Mbabu was courteous enough to advise the Court that the Petitioner’s advocate had reached out to her and informed her he was waiting to be admitted. The Court thereafter proceeded to confirm no one was in the lobby as all parties waiting to be admitted had been admitted after a brief break.

2. The matter was called out and in their absence was dismissed as no one appeared to prosecute the application. As no evidence of the alleged handicap has been adduced coupled with the fact that when Mr. Rotich appeared he did not notify the Court of a power surge. It would seem the current Motion is an afterthought and a belated attempt to bolt the stable doors after the horses have bolted out.

3. The fact that Mrs. Mbabu pointed out an issue that had been notified to her between the first and second sessions is clear indication she did the best she could as a professional and the absence of the Petitioner/Applicant cannot be laid at any one’s door other than their own. As such the Motion being devoid of merit is dismissed with costs to the 1

st

Respondent who was forced to file a response due to the misrepresentation the in the Motion.

Orders accordingly.

DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021

NZIOKI WA MAKAU

JUDGE