Case ID:182111

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Mary Nguyo & 2 others v Wilson Mark Wesa [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Miscellaneous Succession 5 of 2018

Parties:

Mary Nguyo & 2 others v Wilson Mark Wesa

Date Delivered:

17 Sep 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Kakamega

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

William Musya Musyoka

Citation:

Mary Nguyo & 2 others v Wilson Mark Wesa [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Family

County:

Kakamega

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT KAKAMEGA

MISCELLANEOUS SUCCESSION NO. 5 OF 2018

MARY NGUYO

……………………..………………..………………….…….1

ST

APPLICANT

ADELAIDA HOKA MULALAI

……….……….………..…………………..2

ND

APPLICANT

NIFREDA MUNYELA

………….…….……………..……..….……………..3

RD

APPLICANT

VERSUS

WILSON MARK WESA

………………………….…………………..……….RESPONDENT

RULING

1. The matter before me is a Motion, dated 18

th

March 2019, seeking transfer of a succession cause pending at the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi, being Nairobi HCSC No. 1477 of 1997 to the High Court of Kenya at Kakamega. It is argued that the estate comprises only of a property known as West Bunyore/Emusire/1029, and that the cause was initiated at Nairobi with a motive to disinherit some of the survivors and beneficiaries.

2. The response to the application is by way of the preliminary objection, dated 7

th

November 2019. It is argued that the succession cause had been finalized, the application offended section 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the application for transfer ought to have been filed in the cause at Nairobi, and that the registered proprietor of the of the suit parcel of land was the absolute proprietor of the subject land.

3. The Motion seeks a fairly straightforward order, transfer of the succession cause from Nairobi to Kakamega. The argument advanced is fairly simple, the estate comprised of assets situated at Bunyore, within the local limits of the High Court at Kakamega, and there were no assets situate at Nairobi to warrant the matter being in Nairobi. Access to justice would demand that a succession cause ought to be filed at the court nearest to where the estate is situated, so that the parties are able to access the court, and so that, in the event records are required from the lands registry, by either the court or the parties, there would be easier access. It would also be convenient for lands registry staff or officers to attend court where required.

4. The record before me indicates that the deceased died possessed of only one asset, West Bunyore/Emusire/1029. The cause ought not have been filed in Nairobi, some 400 kilometres away from where the asset is situated, and probably away from family members who reside at Bunyore. The grant was confirmed, and the property distributed. However, the office of administrator is for life, and at any time, after distribution, and completion of administration, an administrator can still be called upon to account, and the grant can still be revoked. It is never too late with succession causes.

5. I see nothing wrong with the application. No plausible reason has been given why the matter cannot be transferred from Nairobi. I shall grant it. It would appear that West Bunyore/Emusire/1029 is situated within Vihiga County. A High Court has been established at Vihiga. The matter should be transferred to that court, closest to the registry where the records relating to the assets is situated, and within the County from which the deceased hailed.

6. I consequently order and direct that the court file in Nairobi HCSC No. 1477 of 1977, in the matter of the estate of the late Mariko Munala Ndibo, be transferred from the Nairobi High Court registry to the High Court registry at Vihiga. It is so ordered.

DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021

W. MUSYOKA

JUDGE

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Miscellaneous Succession 5 of 2018', 'Parties:': 'Mary Nguyo & 2 others v Wilson Mark Wesa', 'Date Delivered:': '17 Sep 2021', 'Case Class:': 'Civil', 'Court:': 'High Court at Kakamega', 'Case Action:': 'Ruling', 'Judge(s):': 'William Musya Musyoka', 'Citation:': 'Mary Nguyo & 2 others v Wilson Mark Wesa [2021] eKLR', 'Court Division:': 'Family', 'County:': 'Kakamega', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}