Case ID:181941

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Special Collection Services Limited v Commissioner of Investigation and Enforcement (Tax Appeal E004 of 2021) [2021] KEHC 57 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (24 September 2021) (Ruling)

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Tax Appeal E004 of 2021

Parties:

Special Collection Services Limited v Commissioner of Investigation and Enforcement

Date Delivered:

24 Sep 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

David Amilcar Shikomera Majanja

Citation:

Special Collection Services Limited v Commissioner of Investigation and Enforcement (Tax Appeal E004 of 2021) [2021] KEHC 57 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (24 September 2021) (Ruling)

Advocates:

Mr Thige instructed Muri Mwaniki Thige & Kageni Advocates for the Appellant, Mr Chelang’at Advocate instructed by Kenya Revenue Authority for the Respondent

Court Division:

Commercial and Tax

County:

Nairobi

Advocates:

Mr Thige instructed Muri Mwaniki Thige & Kageni Advocates for the Appellant, Mr Chelang’at Advocate instructed by Kenya Revenue Authority for the Respondent

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

Special Collection Services Limited v Commissioner of Investigation and Enforcement (Tax Appeal E004 of 2021) [2021] KEHC 57 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (24 September 2021) (Ruling)

Neutral citation:

[2021] KEHC 57 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)

Commercial and Tax

Tax Appeal E004 of 2021

DAS Majanja, J

September 24, 2021

Between

Special Collection Services Limited

Appellant

and

Commissioner of Investigation and Enforcement

Respondent

(Being an appeal against the judgment of the Tax Appeals Tribunal at Nairobi dated 25th June 2021 in Appeal No. 328 of 2020)

Ruling

1.

The Tax Appeals Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) dismissed the Appellant appeal on 25

th

June 2021. The appellant has now lodged an appeal and filed the Notice of Motion dated 22

nd

July 2021 seeking, inter alia, orders of stay of execution and enforcement of taxes including issuing agency notices against its bankers. The Respondent is demanding taxes amounting to KES. 44,254,490.00.

2.

The application is supported by the affidavit of the Appellant’s director, Leonard Mulei, sworn on 22

nd

July 2021. It is opposed by the Respondent (“the Commissioner’’) through the Grounds of Opposition dated 9

th

September 2021.

3.

I have considered the deposition and arguments on both sides. Having looked at the history of the parties, there is evidence showing that the Appellant has been paying instalments in the past but in manner unsatisfactory to the Commissioner. If a substantial amount is ordered as security, the Appellant will be forced to shut down its business.

4.

I find a security of KES. 2,000,000.00 in the form of a Bank Guarantee from a reputable Bank would be most appropriate taking into account the circumstances of the case. For the reasons I have set out above, I allow the Notice of Motion dated 22

nd

July 2021 on the following terms:

a.

An order of stay be and is hereby issued staying execution of the Judgment of the Tax Appeal Tribunal dated 25

th

June 2021 in Tax Appeal Tribunal Appeal No. 328 of 2020 and any further enforcement action thereon pending the hearing and determination of this appeal or until further orders of the court.

b.

In consideration of the stay in (a) above, the Appellant shall provide a Guarantee of KES 2,000,000.00 from a reputable bank in favour of the Respondent within forty-five (45) days from the date hereof. In default, stay shall stand discharged.

c.

The costs of this application shall be in the appeal.

d.

The court shall adjourn to issue directions for the hearing and determination of the appeal.

SIGNED AT NAIROBI

D. S. MAJANJA

JUDGE

DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI

THIS

24

TH

DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021.

A. MABEYA

JUDGE

Mr Thige instructed Muri Mwaniki Thige & Kageni Advocates for the Appellant.

Mr Chelang’at Advocate instructed by Kenya Revenue Authority for the Commissioner for Investigations and Enforcement.

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Tax Appeal E004 of 2021', 'Parties:': 'Special Collection Services Limited v Commissioner of Investigation and Enforcement', 'Date Delivered:': '24 Sep 2021', 'Case Class:': 'Civil', 'Court:': 'High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)', 'Case Action:': 'Ruling', 'Judge(s):': 'David Amilcar Shikomera Majanja', 'Citation:': 'Special Collection Services Limited v Commissioner of Investigation and Enforcement (Tax Appeal E004 of 2021) [2021] KEHC 57 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (24 September 2021) (Ruling)', 'Advocates:': 'Mr Thige instructed Muri Mwaniki Thige & Kageni Advocates for the Appellant, Mr Chelang’at Advocate instructed by Kenya Revenue Authority for the Respondent', 'Court Division:': 'Commercial and Tax', 'County:': 'Nairobi', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}