Case ID:181860
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
Kiambaa Properties Co. Ltd v Kiriiyu Merchants Auctioneer [2021] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Tribunal Case E142 of 2021 (Nairobi)
Parties:
Kiambaa Properties Co. Ltd v Kiriiyu Merchants Auctioneer
Date Delivered:
03 Sep 2021
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Hon. Cyprian Mugambi Nguthari - Chairman
Citation:
Kiambaa Properties Co. Ltd v Kiriiyu Merchants Auctioneer [2021] eKLR
Court Division:
Tribunal
County:
Nairobi
Case Outcome:
Landlord’s application allowed
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
TRIBUNAL CASE NO E142 OF 2021 (NAIROBI)
KIAMBAA PROPERTIES CO. LTD......................LANDLORD/APPLICANT
VERSUS
KIRIIYU MERCHANTS AUCTIONEER...............TENANT/RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Landlord/Applicant’s application dated
13
th
May 2021
seeks orders terminating the tenancy between the parties herein and thereafter, orders evicting the Tenant from the suit premises known as Kiambaa Ngara Road. The Applicant has further sought the assistance of the OCS Parklands Police Station in ensuring compliance with the court orders.
2. The application is mainly based on the grounds that the Respondent/Tenant was served with a notice to terminate the tenancy herein and it has never filed an objection to the said notice. The other notable ground is that the Tenant/Respondent continues occupying the suit premises without paying rent.
3. The application is also supported by the affidavit of Edwin Thuo with the authority of the Directors of the Landlord exhibited in the said affidavit.
4. On
23
rd
June 2021,
the court was not satisfied that service in the matter was done at all. The Landlord/Applicant was ordered to serve the application for a fresh hearing on
27
th
July 2021
. On
27
th
July 2021,
the Landlord’s counsel informed the court that she had served the application and duly filed her affidavit of service. I do note that the service referred to was effected through G4S offices, Safari Club Branch, Nairobi. A receipt was duly issued by the G4S Offices.
5. I have also seen the affidavit of Joseph Wanjohi sworn on
6
th
March 2021
. In the said affidavit, the process server confirms that the Landlord’s notice to terminate tenancy was dully served upon the Tenant on
18
th
January 2021
. I am satisfied that the notice to terminate tenancy was property served.
6. The notice to terminate tenancy having not been opposed by the filing of the reference to the Tribunal, then the same became effective on the date specified therein,
1
st
April 2021,
the tenancy therefore stands terminated from that date in terms of
section 10 of Cap 301
which is in the following terms;
“Where a Landlord has served a notice in accordance with the requirements of section 4 of this Act, on a Tenant fails within the appropriate time to notify the Landlord of his unwillingness to comply with such notice or to refer the matter to a Tribunal then subject to section 6 of this Act, such notice shall have effect from the date therein specified to terminate the tenancy or terminate or alter the terms and conditions thereof or the rights or services enjoyed thereunder.”
7. I therefore allow the Landlord’s application in terms of prayer 2, 3 and 4 of its application dated
13
th
May 2021
.
HON. CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI
CHAIRMAN
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
Ruling dated, signed and delivered virtually by
Hon Cyprian Mugambi Nguthari
this
3
rd
day of
September, 2021
in the absence of the parties.
HON. CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI
CHAIRMAN
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL