Case ID:181631

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Republic v Phylis Njeri Mureithi [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Case 24 of 2018

Parties:

Republic v Phylis Njeri Mureithi

Date Delivered:

23 Sep 2021

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Murang'a

Case Action:

Sentence

Judge(s):

Kanyi Kimondo

Citation:

Republic v Phylis Njeri Mureithi [2021] eKLR

Advocates:

Ms. A. Gakumu for the Republic.

Mr. Mwangi Ben for the accused.

Court Division:

Criminal

Advocates:

Ms. A. Gakumu for the Republic.

Mr. Mwangi Ben for the accused.

History Advocates:

Both Parties Represented

Case Outcome:

Accused acquitted

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT MURANG’A

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 24 OF 2018

REPUBLIC...................................................................................PROSECUTOR

VERSUS

PHYLIS NJERI MUREITHI.............................................................ACCUSED

SENTENCE

1. The accused pleaded guilty to the offence of

manslaughter

under a plea agreement recorded on 22

nd

September 2021. The offence is a serious felony that may attract a sentence of life imprisonment.

2. The facts here are truly tragic. The accused, like one possessed, killed her young son. I have considered the accused has a recurring psychiatric illness and has been on medication. This partly explains why the Republic accepted the plea bargain. But in all this the life of an innocent minor was lost.

3. I have paid heed to the mitigation tendered by her counsel,

Mr. Mwaniki Warima.

The accused is a first offender and is remorseful. She also requires to continue with her medication and to regularly see a consultant psychiatrist.

4. As a general rule, sentence

should be commensurate to the moral blameworthiness of the offender

but also guided by the

nature and gravity of crime

. Considering the special circumstances that I have outlined, I sentence the accused to

three (3) years

imprisonment. The sentence shall run from 21

st

June 2018, the date when she was first presented to court and remanded. In view of the period served, the accused shall now be set free forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.

5. It is so ordered.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MURANG’A THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021.

KANYI KIMONDO

JUDGE

Sentence read in open court in the presence of-

Accused.

Ms. A. Gakumu for the Republic.

Mr. S. Kirubi holding brief for Mr. Mwangi Ben for the accused.

Ms. Dorcas Waichuhi & Ms. Susan Waiganjo, Court Assistants.

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Criminal Case 24 of 2018', 'Parties:': 'Republic v Phylis Njeri Mureithi', 'Date Delivered:': '23 Sep 2021', 'Case Class:': 'Criminal', 'Court:': "High Court at Murang'a", 'Case Action:': 'Sentence', 'Judge(s):': 'Kanyi Kimondo', 'Citation:': 'Republic v Phylis Njeri Mureithi [2021] eKLR', 'Advocates:': 'Ms. A. Gakumu for the Republic.\n\nMr. Mwangi Ben for the accused.', 'Court Division:': 'Criminal', 'History Advocates:': 'Both Parties Represented', 'Case Outcome:': 'Accused acquitted', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}