Case ID:181504

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Edward Mbalanya Kafuna v Ideal Security Services Ltd [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Cause 185 of 2018

Parties:

Edward Mbalanya Kafuna v Ideal Security Services Ltd

Date Delivered:

16 Sep 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Mathews Nderi Nduma

Citation:

Edward Mbalanya Kafuna v Ideal Security Services Ltd [2021] eKLR

Advocates:

Okongo Omogeni & Co. Advocates for the Applicant

Karanja and Partners Advocates for the Respondent

Court Division:

Employment and Labour Relations

County:

Nairobi

Advocates:

Okongo Omogeni & Co. Advocates for the Applicant

Karanja and Partners Advocates for the Respondent

History Advocates:

Both Parties Represented

Case Outcome:

Application dismissed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE EMPLOYMENT & LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA

AT NAIROBI

CAUSE NO. 185 OF 2018

EDWARD MBALANYA KAFUNA............................................CLAIMANT/RESPONDENT

VERSUS

IDEAL SECURITY SERVICES LTD......................................RESPONDENT/APPLICANT

RULING

1. The Respondent/Applicant filed a notice of motion application dated 26

th

November, 2020 in which the applicant prays that the suit herein be dismissed for want of prosecution as the Claimant/Respondent has made no steps to prosecute the suit.

2. The applicant states in the grounds set out in the Notice of Motion and supporting affidavit that the suit was filed on 5

th

February, 2018. A statement of defence dated 13

th

March, 2018 was filed and that the claimant has failed and or neglected to take necessary steps towards final determination of the suit in that no hearing date has been set since, hence the suit be dismissed for want of prosecution.

3. The claimant filed a replying affidavit opposing the application and states he has taken steps to prosecute the matter. That on 21

st

November, 2018, the suit was fixed for mention and the advocates on record in the year 2019, visited the Court registry on numerous occasions only to be advised by the Court officials that there were no dates available and that the claimant should await the opening of the diary for the issuance of a hearing date.

4. That on 13

th

March, 2020, the advocates for the claimant wrote to the Deputy Registrar requesting for a mention date. The letter is attached. Again on 9

th

February, 2021, the advocate wrote an email requesting for a mention date. The email is attached to the replying affidavit.

5. The claimant deposes that he has been advised by his advocates that it has been difficult to access the registry since the COVID – 19 pandemic started in 2020.

6. The applicant did not file a supplementary affidavit to challenge the facts set out in the replying affidavit by the claimant.

7. The Court is satisfied that the claimant made reasonable steps to progress the suit but was unable to get a mention date and a hearing date for the hearing and determination of the suit.

8. In any event, the Court is aware and takes judicial notice that due to the backlog of cases at Nairobi, Employment and Labour Relations Court, the Court has not been allocating hearing dates for matters filed in the year 2018. The Court is still expediting hearing and determination of suits filed between the year 2016 and 2017 to date.

9. The application by the respondent is devoid of merits. It cannot be said as was held in

Utalii Transport Company Limited and 3 Others –vs- NIC Bank & Another [2014] eKLR

that the claimant is guilty of indolence and willful neglect or failure to take steps to have the suit heard and determined.

10. The application is dismissed for lack of merit and the suit to be set down for hearing on the merits on the date of delivery of this ruling.

DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI (VIRTUALLY) THIS 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021.

MATHEWS N. NDUMA

JUDGE

Appearances:

Okongo Omogeni & Co. Advocates for the Applicant

Karanja and Partners Advocates for the Respondent

Ekale – Court clerk

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Cause 185 of 2018', 'Parties:': 'Edward Mbalanya Kafuna v Ideal Security Services Ltd', 'Date Delivered:': '16 Sep 2021', 'Case Class:': 'Civil', 'Court:': 'Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi', 'Case Action:': 'Ruling', 'Judge(s):': 'Mathews Nderi Nduma', 'Citation:': 'Edward Mbalanya Kafuna v Ideal Security Services Ltd [2021] eKLR', 'Advocates:': 'Okongo Omogeni & Co. Advocates for the Applicant\n\nKaranja and Partners Advocates for the Respondent', 'Court Division:': 'Employment and Labour Relations', 'County:': 'Nairobi', 'History Advocates:': 'Both Parties Represented', 'Case Outcome:': 'Application dismissed', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}