Case ID:181268

Meshack Kuria Munyua v Republic [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Appeal 10 of 2019

Parties:

Meshack Kuria Munyua v Republic

Date Delivered:

03 Aug 2021

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Naivasha

Case Action:

Directions

Judge(s):

Richard Mururu Mwongo

Citation:

Meshack Kuria Munyua v Republic [2021] eKLR

Advocates:

Ms Maingi for the Respondent

Case History:

(Being an Appeal from the Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.109 of 2016 (S.O.) in the Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court, at Engineer, D. N. Sure, SRM

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Nakuru

Advocates:

Ms Maingi for the Respondent

History Docket No:

Criminal Case No.109 of 2016 (S.O.)

History Magistrate:

Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court, at Engineer,

Case Outcome:

Appeal ordered

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIVASHA

CORAM: R. MWONGO, J.

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2019

MESHACK KURIA MUNYUA..............................................APPELLANT

VERSUS

REPUBLIC..............................................................................RESPONDENT

(Being an Appeal from the Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.109 of 2016 (S.O.) in the Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court, at Engineer, D. N. Sure, SRM

DIRECTIONS

1. Having carefully perused the material in the file herein, the court notes that the Appellant’s written submissions concern a Petition of Appeal filed on 2

nd

August, 2019 and not the Amended Grounds of Appeal filed on 14

th

October, 2020, and submissions thereon.

2. The DPP’s submissions cover the following aspects of the appeal: the issues of Proof of Penetration; Failure to affirm the PW1 and PW2 and the issue of Sentence. Those are the issues raised in the Amended Grounds of Appeal filed on 14

th

October, 2020.

3. In order not to cause any prejudice to the Appellant, there is need for clarity and certainty on exactly what is the appeal and what the State is expected to defend against.

4. Accordingly, parties are directed to return to court to clarify which documentation the Appellant is relying on in his appeal; and which the DPP is to respond to.

5. Consequently, new dates for making the clarification and highlighting the parties submissions to be taken in the term.

Administrative directions

6. Due to the current inhibitions on movement nationally, and in keeping with social distancing requirements decreed by the state due to the Corona-virus pandemic,

this Judgment has been rendered through Teams tele-conference with the consent of the parties noted hereunder, who were also able to participate in the conference. Accordingly, a signed copy of this judgment shall be scanned and availed to the parties and relevant authorities as evidence of the delivery thereof, with the High Court seal duly affixed thereon by the Executive Officer, Naivasha.

7. A printout of the parties’ written consent to the delivery of this judgment shall be retained as part of the record of the Court.

8. Orders accordingly.

Dated and Delivered in Naivasha by teleconference this 3

rd

Day of August, 2021.

________________

R. MWONGO

JUDGE

Attendance list at video/teleconference:

1. Ms Maingi for the Respondent

2. No Representation for the Appellant

3. Meshack Kiria Munyua – Present at Naivasha Maximum Prison

4. Court Assistant - Quinter Ogutu