Case ID:181259

Brian Henia Mwangi & another v Damaries Wanjiku Waweru [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Tribunal Case 155 of 2021 (Nairobi)

Parties:

Brian Henia Mwangi & another v Damaries Wanjiku Waweru

Date Delivered:

16 Jul 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Business Premises Rent Tribunal

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Hon. P. May - Vice Chair

Citation:

Brian Henia Mwangi & another v Damaries Wanjiku Waweru [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Tribunal

County:

Nairobi

Case Outcome:

Application allowed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL

VIEW PARK TOWERS 7

TH

& 8

TH

FLOOR

TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 155 OF 2021 (NAIROBI)

BRIAN HENIA MWANGI & ANOTHER...........................................TENANT

VERSUS

DAMARIES WANJIKU WAWERU..........................................RESPONDENT

RULING

1. The Applicant herein filed a reference and application dated 16/2/2021. The application seeks for orders on the face of the application. The application is supported by the affidavit of the Applicant Brian Henia Mwangi.

2. The reliefs sought are predicated upon allegation that a notice to render vacant possession was issued to the Tenant by the Landlord, that the Tenant has been barred by the Landlord from accessing bore hole water, a borehole he allegedly constructed and that without consideration, the Landlord raised a car wash shade right infront of the Applicant’s rented premises/business.

3. That the Tenant in not in arrears and has paid upto the date of filing application and reference. He also prayed for assessment of the standard rent payable in the aforesaid premises.

4. The Respondents/Landlords has denied the allegations of the Applicant/Tenant but confirm that they informed the Applicant to anticipate a notice in the near future and therefore indicates that the Tenant’s fears were premature.

5. The Respondents basically denied every allegation as put forth by the Applicant.

6. What is clear to me after considering the pleadings herein is that there exists a Tenant-Landlord relationship. It is a controlled tenancy as such governed by CAP 301.

7. I am persuaded to protect the Tenant in the interim pending the hearing and determination of the reference. In any event the Respondents are not saying that they are not receiving rent or that the tenant is not meeting his obligation on the Tenant.

8. I hereby make the orders as follows:

(a) The application dated 16

th

February 2021 is allowed in part that is. Pending the hearing of the reference prayer 2 granted.

(b) The Tenant is hereby allowed to use borehole water unconditionally.

(c) The Respondents are hereby ordered to do a legal connection of electricity in the premises.

(d) OCS Kingeero Police Station to ensure compliance of the orders.

(e) The Parties to facilitate the tribunal for a site visit for inspection and to determine the status of the ……carwash within 14 days.

(f) The parties within 14 days, to file valuation reports to determine rent payable.

(g) The reference to be thus fixed for hearing within 30 days.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 16TH JULY 2021.

HON. P. MAY

VICE CHAIR

BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL

16/7/2021

In the presence of: