Case ID:180428

Ndovu Estates Limited v Peter Lemeria Ole Ntutu [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Environment and Land Case 105 of 2017 (Formerly Nakuru ELC Cause No. 314 of 2016)

Parties:

Ndovu Estates Limited v Peter Lemeria Ole Ntutu

Date Delivered:

23 Jul 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Environment and Land Court at Narok

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Mohammed Noor Kullow

Citation:

Ndovu Estates Limited v Peter Lemeria Ole Ntutu [2021] eKLR

Advocates:

Mr. Otieno for the plaintiff

Ms Mburu for the defendant

Court Division:

Environment and Land

County:

Narok

Advocates:

Mr. Otieno for the plaintiff

Ms Mburu for the defendant

History Advocates:

Both Parties Represented

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAROK

ELC CASE NO. 105 OF 2017

FORMERLY NAKURU ELC CAUSE NO. 314 OF 2016

NDOVU ESTATES LIMITED.......................................................PLAINTIFF

-VERSUS-

PETER LEMERIA OLE NTUTU...............................................DEFENDANT

RULING

I have considered the Application by Mr. C.F. Otieno for the Plaintiff with regards to whether the court should proceed with the hearing of the matter on the basis of a witness statement that was not filed together with the defence.

From the record the defendant had filed his statement of defence on 29/5/2017 and later a witness statement was filed on 9/7/2019 and therefore the defendant ought to have produced both the statement of defence and witness statement. Mr Maina counsel for the defendant argued that they had filed a witness statement on behalf of the defendant together with the defendants list of documents and their statements and there exists no rule to have him produced.

I have considered the application by Mr. Otieno counsel for the plaintiff applicant. The objection raised by Mr. Otieno as fundamental to file proper conduct of the matter and I do agree with him that the defendants ought to have signed his own personal statement as opposed to a statement of defence that is ordinarily signed by the advocates acting for the party and in view of the above I direct that in the interest of justice the defendant’s witness statement only signed by himself be filed and served within 14 days. The said statement ought not to contain anything more than that is contained in the disputed witness statement.

It is so ordered.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAROK ON THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2021.

MOHAMED N. KULLOW

JUDGE

23/7/2021

In the presence of: -

CA:Chuma

Mr. Otieno for the plaintiff

Ms Mburu for the defendant