Case ID:180296

Mattewas Mbaya alias Mathew v Prosecutor [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Case 70 of 2019

Parties:

Mattewas Mbaya alias Mathew v Prosecutor

Date Delivered:

30 Jul 2021

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Daniel Ogola Ogembo

Citation:

Mattewas Mbaya alias Mathew v Prosecutor [2021] eKLR

Advocates:

Mr. Marube for the accused

Mr. Chebii for the state.

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Nairobi

Advocates:

Mr. Marube for the accused

Mr. Chebii for the state.

History Advocates:

Both Parties Represented

Case Outcome:

Application dismissed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

CRIMINAL CASE

70 OF 2019

MATTEWAS MBAYA alias MATHEW .............................ACCUSED

VERSUS

PROSECUTOR.................................................................. REPUBLIC

RULING

This matter is coming up this time round for the application of the accused,

Mathewas Mbaya

Alias

MATHEW

dated 9.3.2021. The same is brought under section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and section 165 of the constitution of Kenya. It is supported by the affidavit of Ntenga Marube, advocate. The same seeks revision of the terms of bond as set by this court. It also has a 2

nd

affidavit of the accused himself in which he denies that he had run away to avoid arrest. But that the casual work he had been doing was over making him go to the village.

The prosecution has opposed this application and placed reliance on the affidavit of the investigating officer originally file in opposition to the applicant’s application for bond.

I have considered the submissions of both sides herein. Worth noting is that this court had considered the accused’s application for bail, the objections to the same as raised by the prosecution side, and made a considered ruling on the same. In the said ruling, the court determined that the prosecution had proved at least 1 compelling reasons as to warrant denial of bail to the accused. That he is a flight risk, shown by the fact that the accused had disappeared immediately after the alleged incident and moved out of Nairobi. He was only to be arrested 3 month’s later in Bungoma.

The accused (applicant) has now come up with an explanation that he had lost his casual job and had to go to the village. In deponing to this fact, the accused had not given any details of his job. Who were his employers? Any proof of that employment? Without these material details, I am not convinced that the accused (applicant) has shown any sufficient cause as to make this court revise the orders issued herein on 15.5.2020. This application dated 9.3.2021 therefore lacks any merit. I dismiss the same

D. O. OGEMBO

JUDGE

30.7.2021.

Court:

Ruling read out in court (on-line) in the presence of accused (Nairobi Remand), Mr. Marube for the accused and Mr. Chebii for the state.

D. O. OGEMBO

JUDGE

30.7.2021.

Court:

A hearing date to be fixed for this case. Hearing 12.10.2021.