Case ID:180025
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
Omaya Co. Advocates v Joseph Okello Odeyo [2021] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Miscellaneous Civil Application 185 of 2018
Parties:
Omaya Co. Advocates v Joseph Okello Odeyo
Date Delivered:
28 Jul 2021
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
High Court at Kisumu
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Fred Andago Ochieng
Citation:
Omaya Co. Advocates v Joseph Okello Odeyo [2021] eKLR
Court Division:
Civil
County:
Kisumu
Case Outcome:
Application awarded to the applicant
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU
MISC. CIVIL APPL. NO. 185 OF 2018
OMAYA CO. ADVOCATES..............................................APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
JOSEPH OKELLO ODEYO........................................RESPONDENT
RULING
The application dated 4
th
December 2020 is for judgment to be entered in favour of the Applicant,
OMAYA & CO. ADVOCATES
, in respect of taxed costs.
1.
On 4
th
July 2019 the learned Taxing Officer, Hon. A. Odawo taxed the Advocate/Client Bill of Costs in the sum of Kshs 80,753.18.
2.
On 15
th
November 2019, the Taxing Officer issued a Certificate of Costs. The said certificate has neither been set aside nor varied. Accordingly, it is deemed to be final as to the amount reflected on the face thereof.
3.
Secondly, the record of the proceedings on 12
th
November 2018 show that the Respondent,
JOSEPH OKELLO ODEYO
, expressly stated that the Applicant had done some work for him, in the capacity of an advocate.
4.
In the result, I find that there is no dispute as to retainer.
5.
I do therefore enter judgment in favour of the Applicant for the sum of Kshs 80,753.18.
6.
The said sum will attract interest at Court rates from 5
th
August 2019 until payment in full.
7.
The date from which interest is applicable has been determined by the Court, by counting 30 days from the date when the Bill of Costs was taxed.
8.
I decline to order that interest be payable from 15
th
November 2018, because although that might be a date which is 30 days from when the Bill of Costs was first presented to the Respondent, the Respondent cannot be faulted for not paying that Bill because when it was later taxed, the amount payable was reduced from Kshs 133,823.04 which the Applicant had first demanded.
9.
The costs of the application are awarded to the Applicant.
10.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU
THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY 2021
FRED A. OCHIENG
JUDGE