Case ID:178635

Tononoka Rolling Mills Limited v Albert Kioko Mutuku [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Civil Appeal 61 of 2018

Parties:

Tononoka Rolling Mills Limited v Albert Kioko Mutuku

Date Delivered:

07 Jul 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Amraphael Mbogholi-Msagha

Citation:

Tononoka Rolling Mills Limited v Albert Kioko Mutuku [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Civil

County:

Nairobi

Case Outcome:

Motion allowed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 61 OF 2018

TONONOKA ROLLING MILLS

LIMITED.............APPELLANT/APPLICANT

-VERSUS-

ALBERT KIOKO MUTUKU........................................................RESPONDENT

RULING

1. The appellant/applicant in this instance has brought the Notice of Motion dated 6

th

April, 2021 supported by the grounds set out on its face and the facts stated in the affidavit of advocate Karen W. Maina. The applicant sought an order to aside the ruling delivered by this court on 11

th

March, 2021 dismissing the appeal and all consequential order, an order reinstating the appeal, and an order granting a stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 29

th

January, 2018 in Milimani CMCC NO. 939 of 2016 pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

2. The respondent opposed the Motion by filing the replying affidavit sworn by advocate Joseph Mwichigi Kinuthia on 20

th

April, 2021.

3. At the

inter partes

hearing of the instant Motion, this court gave directions for the parties to file and exchange written submissions.

4. I have considered the grounds set out on the face of the Motion together with the facts deponed in the affidavits supporting and opposing the Motion, and the rival submissions alongside the authorities cited in reliance thereto.

5. It is clear that the orders sought in the instant Motion are two-fold: the first is for the setting aside of the ruling of this court delivered on 11

th

March, 2021 and consequently, the reinstatement of the appeal.

6. In her supporting affidavit, Karen W. Maina states that the applicant has been keen on prosecuting the appeal and has taken reasonable steps in that respect, namely by requesting for certified copies of the typed proceedings, judgment and decree from the lower court to no avail. The deponent further states that, the hearing of the respondent’s application dated 14

th

January, 2021 which precipitated the dismissal order, took place in the absence of the applicant and without prior notice, and that the file had not been previously placed before the Deputy Registrar for directions on the hearing of the appeal.

7. The applicant also submits that in dismissing suits/appeals, the court ought to weigh the prejudice that is likely to be suffered by either party against the interest of justice vis-à-vis the right of an appellant to be heard on appeal, borrowing from the case of

Pan African Paper Mills Limited v Silvester Nyarango Obwocha [2018] eKLR

in which the court held that, a party’s right of appeal should not be taken away where sufficient cause has been shown.

8. In reply, advocate Joseph Mwichigi Kinuthia states on behalf of the respondent that, the application for dismissal dated 14

th

January, 2021 was duly served upon the applicant, with the hearing date for the said application clearly indicated therein. This was reiterated in the submissions by the respondent, who urges this court to dismiss the instant Motion with costs.

9. On the subject of service of the application for dismissal and/or the hearing notice regarding the same, I find that the same had been addressed by this court and a determination made in its ruling of 11

th

March, 2021. Consequently, this court cannot revisit the issue as it would be sitting on appeal against its own decision.

10. Suffice it to say that upon perusal of the record, I observed that the applicant has annexed to its Motion various letters addressed to the Executive Officer-Chief Magistrate’s Court at Milimani Commercial Courts, requesting for copies of the relevant documents to enable it prepare its record of appeal. Similarly, the record shows that the Deputy Registrar-Civil Appeals Division sent similar correspondence on various dates and it is apparent that none elicited any response. Moreover, I have established from the record that the lower court file is yet to be made available to this court.

11. In the circumstances and notwithstanding the delay in prosecuting the appeal, I am convinced that it would be in the interest of substantive justice to grant the applicant an opportunity to pursue its appeal by setting aside my earlier ruling of 11

th

March, 2021 and by reinstating the appeal.

12. Concerning the second order sought for a stay of execution, it is clear from the record that such order had previously been granted by the lower court on 22

nd

March, 2018 and owing to the decision by this court to set aside its dismissal order which equally vacated the stay order, I find it reasonable to reinstate the stay order in the circumstances.

13. Consequently, the Motion dated 6

th

April, 2021 is meritorious and allowed, therefore giving rise to a grant of the following orders:

a) The ruling and order made by this court on 11

th

March, 2021 dismissing the appeal is hereby set aside and the appeal reinstated.

b) The Executive Officer (Chief Magistrate’s Court-Milimani Commercial Courts) shall avail certified copies of the typed proceedings, judgment delivered on 29

th

January, 2018 and decree in Milimani CMCC NO. 939 OF 2016 to the appellant/applicant within 20 days from this day.

c) The appellant/applicant shall thereafter compile, file and serve its record of appeal within 14 days from the date of receipt of the aforementioned documents.

d) The Executive Officer shall avail the lower court file to the High Court-Civil Appeals Division within 30 days from this day.

e) The parties shall take a date before the Deputy Registrar to confirm availability of the lower court file and to take further directions.

f) The order for stay of execution made on 22

nd

March, 2018 in respect to the judgment in Milimani CMCC NO. 939 OF 2016 is hereby reinstated, subject to the conditions set, where applicable.

g) Costs of the Motion to abide the outcome of the appeal.

DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS …….. DAY OF ……………, 2021.

A. MBOGHOLI MSAGHA

JUDGE

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED ONLINE VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS AT NAIROBI THIS 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2021.

…….….…………….

J. K. SERGON

JUDGE

In the presence of:

…………………………………. for the Appellant

…………………………………. for the Respondent