Case ID:178535

In re VBA (Baby) [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Adoption Cause 133 of 2019

Parties:

In re VBA (Baby)

Date Delivered:

02 Jul 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Judgment

Judge(s):

Maureen Akinyi Odero

Citation:

In re VBA (Baby) [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Family

County:

Nairobi

Case Outcome:

Originating summons allowed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

FAMILY DIVISION

ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 133 OF 2019

IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT NO. 8 OF 2001 AND THE ADOPTION RULES

AND

IN THE MATTER OF BABY VBA

AND

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION

BY

AGM….…..…………… APPLICANT

JUDGMENT

(1) Before this Court is the Originating Summons dated

8

th

October 2019

in which the Applicant

AGM

seeks the following orders:-

1. SPENT

2. SPENT

3. THAT the Applicant be authorized to adopt VBA a minor.

4. THAT the minor be known as VBA M and the same be marked on the Adoption Register.

(2) The Summons which was supported by the statement of the Applicant was canvassed by away of viva voce evidence on the online platform.

(3)

PW1 AGM

was the Applicant. He told the Court that he was a widower and that his wife was one

EAO

(now Deceased) the biological mother of the subject-child. The Applicant told the Court that he took the child into his home in the year

2008

when she was aged

one (1)

year

old and has continued to care for and provide for her ever since. The Applicant now seeks to adopt the child in order to cement and formalize his relationship with her. He confirms that his own family as well as the family of her late wife are all agreeable for the adoption.

(4)

PW2 VBA

was the child in question. She told the Court that she recognizes the Applicant as her father having lived with him since she was aged

one (1) year.

The child expresses her willingness to be adopted by the Applicant.

(5)

PW3 EPHRAIM MUTERO

is an Officer from the

CHANGE TRUST

Adoption Society. He confirms that they have filed their report recommending the adoption.

(6)

PW4 WINFRED IKINYA

represented the

Director of Childrens Services.

She confirms the filing of their report dated

22

nd

July 2020

recommending the adoption.

ANALYSIS AND DETERMINATION

(7) I have considered the evidence adduced in open Court as well as the various Affidavits and Reports filed in this matter. The Preliminary requirements for the making of an Adoption Order are set out in

Section 156(1)

of the

Children’s Act

which provides as follows:-

“

159(1) No arrangement shall be commenced for the adoption of a child unless the child is at least six (6) weeks old and has been declared free for adoption by a Registered Adoption Society in accordance with the Rules prescribed in that behalf.”

(8) The subject child was born on

14

th

August 2007

as evidenced by her Birth Certificate Serial Number

[….]

(Annexture

‘VBA-1’

to the Originating Summons dated

8

th

October 2019).

Thus the subject-child is now aged about fourteen (14) years old well above the

six (6) week

age limit provided for in the

Children Act.

(9)

CHANGE TRUST

which is a Registered Adoption Agency have annexed to the Summons the original copy of their Certificate Serial Number

[….]

dated

24

th

August 2019

declaring the child Free for Adoption. In the circumstances I find that all the legal prerequisites for an adoption order have been met.

(10) The duty of this Court is to examine the evidence before it to determine whether the Applicant is a suitable adoptive father. The Applicant is a Kenyan citizen as evidenced by the copy of his National Identity Card (Annexture

‘VBA-3’

) as was the child’s biological mother who is now Deceased. The Applicant told the Court that he met the child’s mother

EAO

and commenced a relationship with her in the year

2007.

At the time the lady was pregnant with the subject child. It appears that the child’s biological father parted ways with the mother when she fell pregnant and has played no role whatsoever in the life of the child. Indeed the court notes that in the child’s Birth Certificate the Applicant

AGM

is named as her father.

(11) The Applicant told the Court that he married the child’s biological mother under Luo Customary Laws on

15

th

September 2009.

That he took in the child at the age of

one (1) year

and has since that time raised her as his own child. The child’s biological mother later unfortunately passed away in the year

2019

due to complications from child-birth. Her Death Certificate Serial Number

[….]

is annexed to the Summons (Annexture

‘VBA-1(b)’

). The Deceased left behind a new-born baby boy who the Applicant told the Court is currently under the care of his mother-in-law (his wife’s mother). Following the demise of her mother the Applicant has continued to live with and provide for all the needs of the child to date.

(12) The Applicant works as a Director at

[Particulars Withheld] Limited

and he has annexed to the Summons copies of his pay slip. (Annexture

‘VBA-4’

) indicating an income of about

Kshs. 200,000/-,

which is sufficient to cater for the needs of the child. The Applicant owns his own home in the

Kasarani

area of

Nairobi County.

(13) The Applicant is of good health as per a medical report from

Aga Khan Hospital

dated

16

th

August 2019. (Page 13

of

Adoption Agency Report).

He has availed a recommendation letter dated

9

th

August 2019

written by one

Father IN

a Priest in

Gachie.

The Applicant has appointed the child’s maternal grandmother

MNO

as the Legal Guardian for the child. The said Guardian has signed a consent letter dated

8

th

October 2019. (

Annexture

VBA – ‘15’).

All in all I am satisfied that the Applicant having raised this child literally from the time of her birth is suitable as an adoptive parent for said child.

(14) In deciding upon any matter involving a child Courts are obliged to give priority to the best interests of the said child.

Section 4(2)

of the

Children Act

provides:-

“(2) In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, Courts of Law administrative authorities or legislative bodies,

the best interest of the child shall be a primary consideration

.” [own emphasis]

(15) The subject-child is the biological child of the Applicants late wife. Although the Applicant is

not

the biological father of the child he has lived with and provided for the child from the time she was born. The child’s father has played no role at all in her life. A letter dated

12

th

July 2019

written by the Assistant Chief

Ruaka Location

confirms that the Applicant was recognized as the father of the child (Annexture

‘VBA-6’

).

(16)

Section 76(3)(a)

of the

Children Act

which provides:-

“(3) Where the Court is considering whether or not to make an order with regard to a child, it shall have particular regard to the following matters-

(a)

The ascertainable feelings and wishes of the child concerned

with reference to the child’s age and understanding.” [own emphasis]

(17) The Court was able to interview the child who at the age of

thirteen (3) years

was well able to express herself and to articulate her wishes. She referred to the Applicant as her father. The child stated that she understood that the Applicant wished to adopt her and become her

‘real’

father. She expressed her willingness to be adopted by the Applicant.

(18) This is a child who has lost her mother. The Applicant is the only remaining parent she knows and recognizes. The various reports filed in Court indicate that the child enjoys a loving daughter-father relationship with the Applicant. The child’s female cousin often stays in the home to provide company for the child.

(19) A home visit was conducted by the Children’s Officer. The Applicant was found to be living in his own home. It is a spacious three bed-roomed house. The child occupies her own bed-room. The Applicant has enrolled the child at

C School

a nearby school where she has friends and is thriving academically. The family are supportive of the Adoption and the Report of the Adoption Agency indicates that the child’s maternal grand-mother has given the Applicant a piece of land in the rural home in

Kimilili, Bungoma County

where the child’s mother was laid to rest.

(20) This is a kinship adoption. The child is already in a Family Unit. The adoption is merely to formalize her status. The child will remain in the same family environment and will be able to maintain close ties with her mother’s family and with her baby brother. It is my view that this adoption certainly serves the best interest of the child. Accordingly I allow this Originating Summons and I make the following orders:-

(i) The Applicant

AGM

is authorized to adopt the child

VBA.

(ii) Upon adoption the child shall be known as

VBAM.

(iii) The Registrar – General to make the relevant entry in the Adopted Children’s Register.

(iv)

MNO

is appointed as the Legal Guardian for the child.

DATED IN NAIROBI THIS 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2021.

..........................................

MAUREEN A. ODERO

JUDGE