Case ID:178261

Fred Onyango Orimba v Republic [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Case 5 of 2020

Parties:

Fred Onyango Orimba v Republic

Date Delivered:

30 Jun 2021

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Daniel Ogola Ogembo

Citation:

Fred Onyango Orimba v Republic [2021] eKLR

Advocates:

Ms. Murito for Accused

Ms. Kimani for the State

Court Division:

Criminal

Advocates:

Ms. Murito for Accused

Ms. Kimani for the State

History Advocates:

Both Parties Represented

Case Outcome:

Application allowed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT NAIROBI

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 5 OF 2020

FRED ONYANGO ORIMBA ..........................ACCUSED

VERSUS

DPP.................................................................REPUBLIC

RULING

This matter now comes up for the application of the accused/applicant dated 14.10.2020. At prayer (b) of the same, the applicant prays for review of the terms of bond issued herein in favour of the accused. The accused had been granted a bond of Kshs.2 million with 1 surety of a similar amount with an alternative of Ksh.200,000/=in cash bail. Counsel for the accused has urged the court to take into account the special circumstances of the accused, being of poor background, married with 2 children. Also that he has been in custody since 2019. She relied on the decision of Republic Versus Evans Ochieng (2019)eKLR, and pleaded for reasonable terms of bail.

The prosecution, on the other hand, has opposed this application on grounds that the applicant has not shown that he has put any efforts at securing the terms of bond. Also of likelihood of interference with witnesses.

I have considered the submissions of both sides. This is an application for revision of this court’s orders of 29.1.2020. Prior to the said ordered, the court considered the objections of the prosecution. A considered ruling was made on the same. The objection of the prosecution on the fact that if released, the accused is likely to interfere with prosecution witnesses, was well considered in the said ruling.

Special circumstances have been pleaded in this present application. That he has been in custody since 2019 for inability to meet the terms of bond as set. I have taken note of this. I have further taken note of the current Covid-19 pandemic and the need to decongest the prisons and remand facilities. It is for these reasons that I find merit in the applicant’s application for revision of the terms of bail. I allow the same and order that the accused may be released on revised conditions as follows:-

1. Bond of Ksh. 1 million with 1 surety of a similar amount.

2. In the alternative a cash bail of Ksh.100,000.

All the other terms of bond as ordered on 29.1.2020 to remain as earlier ordered. Orders accordingly.

D. O. OGEMBO

JUDGE

30.6.2021.

Court:

Ruling read in court (on-line) in presence of the accused (Nairobi Remand), Ms. Murito for accused and Ms. Kimani for the state.

D. O. OGEMBO

JUDGE

30.6.2021.

Court:

In the presence of the parties, a hearing date to be fixed. Hearing 29.9.2021.

D. O. OGEMBO

JUDGE

30.6.2021.