Case ID:177817

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


George Kiarie Ngerere v Republic [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Revision Case 52 of 2019

Parties:

George Kiarie Ngerere v Republic

Date Delivered:

29 Jun 2021

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Review

Judge(s):

Jessie Wanjiku Lesiit

Citation:

George Kiarie Ngerere v Republic [2021] eKLR

Advocates:

Mr. Mutuma for the State.

Case History:

(Being an application for review of sentence from the decision of this court (Lesiit, J) in High Court Criminal Case No. 26 of 2015 delivered on 19th July 2018)

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Nairobi

Advocates:

Mr. Mutuma for the State.

History Docket No:

Criminal Case 26 of 2015

History Judges:

Jessie Wanjiku Lesiit

History Advocates:

One party or some parties represented

History County:

Nairobi

Case Outcome:

Application struck out

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

CRIMINAL DIVISION

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO. 52 OF 2019

LESIIT, J.

GEORGE KIARIE NGERERE...........................................APPLICANT

VERSUS

REPUBLIC.........................................................................RESPONDENT

(Being an application for review of sentence from the decision of this court (Lesiit, J) in High Court Criminal Case No. 26 of 2015 delivered on 19

th

July 2018)

RULING ON REVIEW

1. The Applicant filed a Notice of Motion filed on 28/2/19. The Motion does not set out what is being sought in the application but also refers to an affidavit sworn in support of the application.

2. I have seen the affidavit. It seems to set out factors that should be considered before sentencing. What catches my eye is the averment that the Applicant spent 3 years 6 months in custody and that that should be deducted from his sentence.

3. Ms Ogweno Learned Prosecution Counsel for the State brought the attention of the court to the fact that this court was the one which passed the sentence against the Applicant, which was the subject of the application. Counsel urged that all the matters raised by the Applicant were in fact considered by the court before passing sentence.

4. The Applicant was the accused before me in High Court Criminal Case No. 26/15. He faced a charge of

murder

contrary to

section 203

of the

Penal Code

. After the trial, I convicted the Applicant of manslaughter and proceeded to sentence him to six years’ imprisonment, after taking mitigation from him.

5. In a poorly drafted application which does not invoke any law, nor spell out orders sought to be made, he has returned before me. If my understanding is right, he seems to seek to have his sentence re-visited by the court, expects a deduction of the term of sentence, and writes the court in his affidavit to give a non-custodial sentence.

6. The Applicant had a right of appeal against the conviction entered herein and also the sentence. It is not clear whether he filed any appeal to the Court of Appeal. That is where the issues raised in the affidavit and the Notice of Motion should be addressed.

7. No law allows a court to sit on appeal over its own decision. And in criminal cases, a court cannot meddle with an order in sentence it pronounced against an accused before it, except in cases governed by the Guiding Judgement of the

Supreme Court in Muruatetu and Anor. Vs Republic Petition No. 15 of 2016

. This case does not fall under the

Muruatetu,

supra, judgment.

8. The application is incompetent and cannot stand. The same is struck out accordingly.

DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 28

TH

DAY OF MAY, 2021.

LESIIT, J.

JUDGE

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021.

BY

OGEMBO, D.O.

JUDGE

29/6/2021

Court

Ruling read out in court (on-line) in presence of the applicant (Nairobi West Prison) and Mr. Mutuma for the State.

OGEMBO, D.O.

JUDGE

29/6/2021

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Criminal Revision Case 52 of 2019', 'Parties:': 'George Kiarie Ngerere v Republic', 'Date Delivered:': '29 Jun 2021', 'Case Class:': 'Criminal', 'Court:': 'High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)', 'Case Action:': 'Review', 'Judge(s):': 'Jessie Wanjiku Lesiit', 'Citation:': 'George Kiarie Ngerere v Republic [2021] eKLR', 'Advocates:': 'Mr. Mutuma for the State.', 'Case History:': '(Being an application for review of sentence from the decision of this court (Lesiit, J) in High Court Criminal Case No. 26 of 2015 delivered on 19th July 2018)', 'Court Division:': 'Criminal', 'County:': 'Nairobi', 'History Docket No:': 'Criminal Case 26 of 2015', 'History Judges:': 'Jessie Wanjiku Lesiit', 'History Advocates:': 'One party or some parties represented', 'History County:': 'Nairobi', 'Case Outcome:': 'Application struck out', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}