Case ID:176218
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
In re Estate of Daniel Wainaina Gachoka [2021] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Succession Cause 346 of 1986
Parties:
In re Estate of Daniel Wainaina Gachoka alias Daniel Mariba Gachoka (Deceased)
Date Delivered:
07 May 2021
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Maureen Akinyi Odero
Citation:
In re Estate of Daniel Wainaina Gachoka [2021] eKLR
Court Division:
Civil
County:
Nairobi
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 346 OF 1986
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DANIEL WAINAINA GACHOKA
alias DANIEL MARIBA GACHOKA (DECEASED)
JOHN MBIRI GACHOKA
LUCAS KAIRU WAIRIMU
(as the administrators of the Estate of
MARGRET MAGIRI (Deceased))
...........................APPLICANTS
VERSUS
STEPHEN KAGUKU MARIBA ............................RESPONDENT
RULING
(1) Before this Court is the Notice of Motion dated
16
th
July 2020
in which
JOHN MBIRI GACHOKA & LUCAS KAIRU WAIRIMU
(as administrators of the Estate of
MARGARET MAGIRI
) (hereinafter
‘the Applicants’
) seek the following orders:-
1. SPENT
2. SPENT
3. The Honourable Court be pleased to order that the Confirmed Grant issued to STEPHEN KAGUKU MARIBA be revoked.
4. In the alternative, the Honourable Court be pleased to order that he confirmed grant issued to STEPHEN KAGUKU MARIBA be amended or rectified to remove half of the LR No. Kiganjo/Kiganjo/110 from the assets of the estate of DANIEL WAINAINA GACHOKA alias DANIEL MARIBA GACHOKA.
5. The Respondent be compelled to sign the mutation and transfer forms hiving off half of LR No. Kiganjo/Kiganjo/110 to the personal representatives of the Estate of Margaret Magiri (Deceased), failing which the Deputy Registrar of this Honourable Court to sign the said the mutation and transfer forms.
6. The costs of this application be provided for.
(2) The Application was premised upon
Section 76
of the
Law of Succession Act,
and
Rule 44(1)
of the
Probate and Administration Rules
and was supported by the Affidavit sworn on
16
th
July 2020
by the 1
st
Applicant
JOHN MBIRI GACHOKA
and the 2
nd
Applicant
LUCAS KAIRU WAIRIMU.
BACKGROUND
(3) This cause relates to the estate of
MARGARET MAGIRI
(the Deceased) who in
High Court Civil Case No. 1554 of 1989
was declared to have acquired by way of adverse possession a half share in the property known as
Title L.R. No. Kiganjo/Kiganjo/110
. The Court of Appeal in
Civil Appeal No. 188 of 2002
upheld the decision of the High Court that the Deceased and her children were entitled to equal proportions in the estate of
DANIEL WAINAINA GACHOKA
alias
DANIEL MARIBA GACHOKA
.
(4) The Applicant alleges that despite being fully aware of the above decisions the Respondent proceeded to sub-divide the said parcel of land to his immediate family to the exclusion of the beneficiaries of
MARGARET MAGIRI
(the Deceased) in effect disinheriting them. Hence the present application.
(5) The Respondent despite having been served with the present application failed to file any reply thereto.
ANALYSIS AND DETERMINATION
(6) The application was disposed of by way of written submissions. The Applicants filed in Court their written submissions dated
28
th
January 2021.
(7) I have carefully considered this application, the Affidavit in Support as well as the annextures thereto. It is evident that the Applicants did file another application dated
28
th
June 2019
seeking similar orders. In a ruling delivered on
27
th
February 2020
,
Hon. Lady Justice Ali-Aroni
delivered a Ruling in which she stated as follows:-
“6. I have considered the matter and do concur with the Respondent on the Applicants capacity to bring this application as they are neither the representatives of the estate of Margaret Magiri (Deceased) nor the estate of Kibe Mariba (Deceased) though I note that the Applicants may have a genuine claim nonetheless.
7. Consequently, I will decline the application for now. The Applicants be at liberty to re-apply as the application is not yet determined on merit once they obtain legal capacity.”
(8) The Applicants have not demonstrated that they are the legal representatives of the estate of the late
Margaret Magiri
. As such the Applicants have failed to comply with the directives given by
Justice Ali-Aroni
in her Ruling of
26
th
February 2020
. All they have done is to file the same application once again. The orders sought in this application cannot be granted to the Applicants until the orders of
Justice Ali-Aroni
have been complied with. Only then will the Applicants have the requisite locus standi to pursue this matter. In the circumstances I do hereby strike out the Notice of Motion dated
16
th
July 2020
and make no orders on costs.
DATED IN NAIROBI THIS 7TH DAY OF MAY, 2021.
…………………………………..
MAUREEN A. ODERO
JUDGE