Case ID:176073

Wilson Ondicho Mboga v Nicholas Maina Arisi & another (suing as the legal Administrators of the Estate of Alice Kwamboka (Deceased) [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Civil Appeal E3 of 2021

Parties:

Wilson Ondicho Mboga v Nicholas Maina Arisi & Thomas Morara Ondari (suing as the legal Administrators of the Estate of Alice Kwamboka (Deceased)

Date Delivered:

27 May 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Nyamira

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Esther Nyambura Maina

Citation:

Wilson Ondicho Mboga v Nicholas Maina Arisi & another (suing as the legal Administrators of the Estate of Alice Kwamboka (Deceased) [2021] eKLR

Case History:

{Being an appeal against the Judgement of Hon. W. C. Waswa (Mr.) – RM Nyamira dated and delivered on the 18th day of December 2020 in the original Nyamira Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No. 189 of 208}

Court Division:

Civil

County:

Nyamira

History Docket No:

Civil Case No. 189 of 208}

History Magistrate:

Hon. W. C. Waswa (Mr.) - RM

History County:

Nyamira

Case Outcome:

Application allowed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT NYAMIRA

CIVIL APPEAL NO. E3 OF 2021

WILSON ONDICHO MBOGA.........................................................................................APPELLANT

VERSUS

NICHOLAS MAINA ARISI & THOMAS MORARA ONDARI

(Suing as the Legal Administrators of the estate of

ALICE KWAMBOKA (Deceased)...............................................................................

RESPONDENTS

{Being an appeal against the Judgement of Hon. W. C. Waswa (Mr.) – RM Nyamira

dated and delivered on the 18

th

day of December 2020 in the original Nyamira

Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No. 189 of 208}

RULING

This is a ruling on the appellant’s application in the Notice of Motion dated 15

th

February 2021, filed herein on even date, seeking a stay of execution pending hearing and determination of this appeal. The application is brought under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

The application was heard by way of written submissions. I have considered the rival submissions carefully.

Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules

provides that an application for an order for stay of execution must fulfill the following conditions: -

That substantial loss may result unless the order is made.

That the application has been made without unreasonable delay.

That the applicant is willing to deposit such security as the court shall order for the due performance of such decree as may ultimately be binding on him.

Applying the above provisions to this application I am satisfied that the same meets the criteria for grant of the order sought. The award which is the subject of the appeal is a substantial amount. The applicant having

prima facie

demonstrated that the respondent would not be in a position to refund the same, the respondents have not offered any evidence to rebut the allegation that their financial means are unknown. I also have no difficulty in making a finding that the application was made timeously.

Accordingly, the application is granted but on a condition that the appellant/applicant shall within 21 days of this ruling deposit the entire decretal sum either in court or in an interest earning account in the joint names of the Advocates on either side. The applicant shall also bear the costs of the application. It is so ordered.

Ruling signed, dated and delivered in Nyamira (Electronically via Microsoft Teams) this 27

th

day of May 2021.

E. N. MAINA

JUDGE