Case ID:176050

Housing Finance Company of Kenya Limited v Stella Kaari Murungi & another [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Civil Appeal E199 of 2020

Parties:

Housing Finance Company of Kenya Limited v Stella Kaari Murungi & Franklin Mwendwa

Date Delivered:

20 May 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Beatrice Thuranira Jaden

Citation:

Housing Finance Company of Kenya Limited v Stella Kaari Murungi & another [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Civil

County:

Nairobi

Case Outcome:

Application allowed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

CIVIL DIVISION

HIGH COURT CIVIL APPEAL NO. E199 OF 2020

HOUSING FINANCE COMPANY OF KENYA LIMITED...........................APPLICANT

VERSUS

STELLA KAARI MURUNGI...............................................................1

ST

RESPONDENT

FRANKLIN MWENDWA....................................................................2

ND

RESPONDENT

RULING

1. The application dated 7

th

September, 2020 seeks orders that:

“1. That the honourable court be pleased to admit the Appeal filed herein out of time and the same be deemed as properly filed.

2.That the costs of this application be in the cause.”

2. The application is premised on the grounds set out on the face of the application and is supported by the affidavit sworn by the counsel for the Applicant. The delay in filing the Appeal is blamed on the outbreak of the COVID 19 Pandemic which caused the closure of the courts. It is further averred that the ruling herein was delivered without notice to the Applicant’s counsel. That following inquiries it turned out that the Ruling Notice had been sent to the wrong address. That after obtaining a copy of the ruling the Applicant was informed of the same and instructed the counsel to file an Appeal. It is further stated that the Appeal is arguable and ought to be given a chance to proceed on merit.

3. The application is opposed. It is stated in the replying affidavit that the application is incompetent and made in bad faith as the Appeal will delay the hearing of the primary suit. That no plausible explanation has been given for the delay. It is further stated that the Appeal has no chance of success. The court was urged to dismiss the application.

4. I have considered the application, the response to the same and the submissions filed by the respective counsel for the parties.

5. On enlargement of time, the principles applicable were set out by the Supreme Court of Kenya in the

Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 others [2014] eKLR

as follows:

“This being the first case in which this court is called upon to consider the principles for extension of time, we derive the following as the under-lying principles that a court should consider in exercise of such discretion:

1. Extension of time is not a right of a party. It is an equitable remedy that is only available to a deserving party at the discretion of the court;

2. A party who seeks for extension of time has the burden of laying a basis to the satisfaction of the court;

3. Whether the court should exercise the discretion to extend time, is a consideration to be made on a case to case basis;

4. Whether there is a reasonable reason for the delay. The delay should be explained to the satisfaction of the court.

5. Whether there will be any prejudice suffered by the respondents if the extension is granted;

6. Whether the application has been brought without undue delay; and

7. Whether in certain cases, like election petitions, public interest should be consideration for extending time.”

6. The ruling that is the subject of the application herein was delivered on 29

th

May, 2020. The instant application was filed about four months later on 14

th

September, 2020. However, the delay has been explained to the satisfaction of the court. This court takes judicial notice of the outbreak of the COVID 19 Pandemic and the unprecedented challenges it has posed in the administration of justice.

7. In the upshot, the application is allowed with costs in cause. The requisite court fees for the filing of the Appeal to be paid within 14 days from the date hereof.

Date, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 20

th

day of May, 2021

B. THURANIRA JADEN

JUDGE