Case ID:175703
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
Kaihu Karugo v Kamau Njigua & 5 others [2021] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Civil Case 90 of 2010 (OS)
Parties:
Kaihu Karugo v Kamau Njigua, Monicah Muthoni Mwangi, Wambui Kahoreria, Muguru Mwangi, Priscilla Wambui Ngugi & Wambugu Njuru (All Trading as Kenda Boarding & Lodging)
Date Delivered:
24 May 2021
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Aggrey Otsyula Muchelule
Citation:
Kaihu Karugo v Kamau Njigua & 5 others [2021] eKLR
Court Division:
Family
County:
Nairobi
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
FAMILY DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 90 OF 2010 (OS)
KAIHU KARUGO.......................PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT
VERSUS
KAMAU NJIGUA....................................1
ST
DEFENDANT
MONICAH MUTHONI MWANGI........2
ND
DEFENDANT
WAMBUI KAHORERIA.........................3
RD
DEFENDANT
MUGURU MWANGI.............................4
TH
DEFENDANT
PRISCILLA WAMBUI NGUGI.............5
TH
DEFENDANT
WAMBUGU NJURU..............................6
TH
DEFENDANT
(ALL TRADING AS KENDA BOARDING & LODGING)
RULING
1. In the judgment delivered on 5
th
October 2018 in this originating summons, Justice W. Musyoka found that the parties herein were partners, and the plaintiff had issued a notice of termination of the partnership. The court ordered the winding up of the partnership, and asked that the partnership property be valued and sold and the proceeds be shared among the partners proportionate to their respective shares.
2. There is disagreement on the value of the assets. This is because the three valuers who valued the property each returned a different valuation. There is also disagreement on who will source for the buyers, whether a commission shall be paid to those sourcing, and how the liabilities (including payment to respective advocates) shall be done. Further, some properties’ title documents have either been misplaced or lost and for others leases have expired and have not been renewed. Lastly, the application does not mention Nyamu Muchunu who was one of the partners but has since died.
3. In the wider interest of justice, and being cognisant of
Article
159(2)(c)
of the Constitution, I refer this matter to Court Annexed Mediation for the parties to discuss these issues and be helped to reach a mutually beneficial resolution.
4. The Deputy Registrar is hereby directed to enable the mediation. Mention shall be on
26
th
July 2021
.
DATED AND DELIVERED ELECTRONICALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 24
TH
DAY OF MAY 2021.
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE