Case ID:175515

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Republic v Jadiel Kaberia [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Case (Murder) 62 of 2019

Parties:

Republic v Jadiel Kaberia

Date Delivered:

20 May 2021

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Meru

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Thripsisa Wanjiku Cherere

Citation:

Republic v Jadiel Kaberia [2021] eKLR

Advocates:

For the Accused - Mr. Muriira Advocate

For the State - Ms. Mbithe

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Meru

Advocates:

For the Accused - Mr. Muriira Advocate

For the State - Ms. Mbithe

History Advocates:

Both Parties Represented

Case Outcome:

Accused not guilty.

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT MERU

(

CORAM: CHERERE-J_

CRIMINAL CASE (MURDER) NO. 62 OF 2019

BETWEEN

REPUBLIC.................................................................................................PROSECUTOR

AND

JADIEL KABERIA............................................................................................ACCUSED

RULING

1)

JADIEL KABERIA

(

Accused

) is charged with the offence of Murder Contrary to

Section 203

as read with

Section 204

of the Penal Code. The particulars of the charge are that

On diverse dates between 27

th

and 28

th

June, 2019 at an unknown time at Kiegoi Location, in Igembe South Sub-County within Meru County, unlawfully murdered Kianga M’Atheru

2) Accused is son of

Kianga M’Atheru

(deceased) and PW1 Eunice Nkatha.

3) The prosecution case was that prior to the death of the deceased, Accused and his father had been having disagreements to a point where Accused had severally made threats to kill his father.

4) That Accused had made threats to kill his father was the thread that ran through the evidence by his mother PW1 Eunice Nkatha, neigbour PW2 Geofrey Kunja, a police officer PW3 PC Naomi Syokau and brother in law PW5 Joel Kalemi.

5) It therefore follows that when Accused father’s body was discovered on 28

th

June, 2019, Accused was on the basis of threats allegedly made to the deceased arrested and charged.

6) There is no doubt that the deceased died. The postmortem form,

PEXH. 1,

shows that deceased died of cardiopulmonary arrest due to severe heavy head injury with internal haemorrhage.

7) None of the prosecution witnesses stated that accused person committed the unlawful act that caused the death of the deceased.

8) The issue for determination is whether on the basis of threats allegedly made by the Accused, the Prosecution has established a primafacie case upon which Accused can safely be called upon to defend himself.

9) The totality of the prosecution wholly relied on the intent that Accused had made and no other investigation was carried out to link Accused to the death of his father.

10) At best, the evidence led by the prosecution only amounts to suspicion. In the case of

Sawe vs. Republic

[2003] KLR 354

the Court of Appeal held:

Suspicion, however strong, cannot provide the basis of inferring guilt which must be proved by evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

11) In the absence of any other evidence pointing an accusing finger at the Accused, I am not persuaded that there is sufficient evidence to warrant this Court to put the Accused on his defence because the evidence on record is such that it cannot sustain a conviction even in the event that Accused is placed on his defence and he elects to exercise his Constitutional right to remain silent under Article 50 (2) (1) of the Constitution.

12) Consequently, under the Provisions of Section 306 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, Accused is hereby found

NOT GUILTY.

DATED AT MERU THIS 20TH DAY OF MAY 2021.

T. W. CHERERE

JUDGE

Court Assistant - Kinoti

Accused - Present

For the Accused - Mr. Muriira Advocate

For the State - Ms. Mbithe

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Criminal Case (Murder) 62 of 2019', 'Parties:': 'Republic v Jadiel Kaberia', 'Date Delivered:': '20 May 2021', 'Case Class:': 'Criminal', 'Court:': 'High Court at Meru', 'Case Action:': 'Ruling', 'Judge(s):': 'Thripsisa Wanjiku Cherere', 'Citation:': 'Republic v Jadiel Kaberia [2021] eKLR', 'Advocates:': 'For the Accused - Mr. Muriira Advocate\n\nFor the State - Ms. Mbithe', 'Court Division:': 'Criminal', 'County:': 'Meru', 'History Advocates:': 'Both Parties Represented', 'Case Outcome:': 'Accused not guilty.', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}