Case ID:175444
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
George Maina Ndung’u v Republic [2021] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Criminal Appeal 987 of 2001
Parties:
George Maina Ndung’u v Republic
Date Delivered:
19 May 2021
Case Class:
Criminal
Court:
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Lilian Nabwire Mutende
Citation:
George Maina Ndung’u v Republic [2021] eKLR
Court Division:
Criminal
County:
Nairobi
Case Outcome:
Appeal ordered
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION- MILIMANI COURT
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 987 OF 2001
GEORGE MAINA NDUNG’U.......................................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..................................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Upon arraignment, George Maina Ndungu the Appellant was charged jointly with six (6) others with two counts of stealing goods in transit contrary to
Section 279 (c)
of the Penal Code; forgery contrary to
Section 349
of the Penal Code; and uttering a document with intent to defraud contrary to
Section 357 (b)
of the Penal Code.
2. Having been taken through full trial, they were found guilty of stealing goods in transit, convicted and sentenced to serve eighteen years imprisonment, plus administration of corporal punishment on the 19
th
day of December, 2001.
3. Aggrieved, he exercised his right of appeal by appealing against the conviction and sentence.
4. On 20
th
December, 2001, he applied to be released on bail pending appeal, an application that was allowed. The court granted him Ksh. 200,000/- surety recognizance. Particulars of his surety were as follows:
Njoroge Mwangi
Identity Number 6440642
P.O. Box 56301
Telephone Number-212201
House- 787461
Residential- Buruburu Estate (Prudential Estate)
House Number 24(Owner)
Friends contact: Occupation-Sparkling Cleaners
P.O. Box 56301, Telephone No. 212201, Loita Street, Uniafric House.
5. The Surety presented security which was a Logbook Serial Number 579672 for Motor vehicle Registration Number KAK 789 M. The Appellant did not follow conditions set, he absconded and his surety who promised to supervise him by ensuring his attendance in court did not report to court. He was therefore required to show cause as to why the recognizance could not be estreated. The surety having failed to discharge his duty and the police having failed to execute the warrant of arrest issued for both the Appellant and his surety, the court was mandated to recover the security by issuance of a warrant for attachment of the security which was movable property that should have been sold.
(See Section 131(2)
of the Criminal Procedure Code).
6. The Appellant having been released on 24
th
December, 2021 and having absconded, the case was mentioned by several Judges, namely: Mbito J, Lesiit J, Warsame J (As he then was), Njagi J, and Ngenye-Macharia J. I took over the matter on the 24
th
February, 2021 and there has been reluctance on the part of the ODPP and DCI, Railways to act as provided in law. The matter has been mentioned in court for the last twenty (20) years without execution of the warrants of arrest issued for both the Appellant and the surety.
7.
Section 357
of the CPC provides thus:
(1) After the entering of an appeal by a person entitled to appeal, the High Court, or the subordinate court which convicted or sentenced that person, may order that he be released on bail with or without sureties, or, if that person is not released on bail, shall at his request order that the execution of the sentence or order appealed against shall be suspended pending the hearing of his appeal:
8. Upon being released on bond, the sentence meted out against the Appellant was suspended, and, having absconded twenty years ago, he is deemed to have abandoned the appeal. The sentence imposed was therefore not served. I therefore make orders as follows:
a) The DCI be and is hereby directed to arrest the Appellant and present him to Prison to serve his jail term.
b) The DCI shall arrest the Surety to be dealt with in accordance with section 131(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
c) This file be and
is hereby be deemed to be closed.
8. It is so ordered.
Dated, Signed and Delivered Virtually this 19th Day of May, 2021.
L. N. MUTENDE
JUDGE