Case ID:174763
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
NMN v MKN (suing as next friend of PKN
(being a person of unsound mind); Esther Wacu Kiharu & 11 others (Interested Parties) [2021] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Civil Appeal (Application) 20 of 2020
Parties:
NMN v MKN (suing as next friend of PKN (being a person of unsound mind); Esther Wacu Kiharu, Peter Kimani Ndungu, David Ndwiga Njuguna, Martha Wangui Gitahi, Benard Bundi Mwai, Samuel Wagura Githinji, Jeremiah Kariuki Ireri, Patrick Muchoki, George Mari Ngugi, Rosemary Njeri Mucheru, Wilson Laibuni Gituma & Peter Wamai Nyaga (Interested Parties)
Date Delivered:
07 May 2021
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Martha Karambu Koome, Patrick Omwenga Kiage, Agnes Kalekye Murgor
Citation:
NMN v MKN (suing as next friend of PKN
(being a person of unsound mind); Esther Wacu Kiharu & 11 others (Interested Parties) [2021] eKLR
Advocates:
Mr Musyoki for the Interested Parties
Mr Thuo for the Applicant
Case History:
(An application for joinder as Interested Parties and Injunction pending the hearing and determination of this appeal, against the judgment orders of the High Court at Thika (Mbugua, J.) delivered on 2nd May, 2019 in ELC No 373 of 2017
Court Division:
Environment and Land
County:
Kiambu
Advocates:
Mr Musyoki for the Interested Parties
Mr Thuo for the Applicant
History Docket No:
ELC No 373 of 2017
History Judges:
Lucy Ngima Mbugua
History County:
Kiambu
Case Outcome:
Application allowed
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
(CORAM: KOOME, KIAGE & MURGOR JJ.A)
CIVIL APPEAL (APPLICATION) NO. 20 OF 2020
BETWEEN
NMN.......................................................................................................................APPLICANT
AND
MKN (Suing as next friend of PKN (being a person of unsound mind).......RESPONDENT
AND
1. ESTHER WACU KIHARU......................................................1
ST
INTERESTED PARTY
2. PETER KIMANI NDUNGU...................................................2
ND
INTERESTED PARTY
3. DAVID NDWIGA NJUGUNA.................................................3
RD
INTERESTED PARTY
4. MARTHA WANGUI GITAHI.................................................4
TH
INTERESTED PARTY
5. BENARD BUNDI MWAI.......................................................5
TH
INTERESTED PARTY
6. SAMUEL WAGURA GITHINJI............................................6
TH
INTERESTED PARTY
7. JEREMIAH KARIUKI IRERI..............................................7
TH
INTERESTED PARTY
8. PATRICK MUCHOKI...........................................................8
TH
INTERESTED PARTY
9. GEORGE MARI NGUGI......................................................9
TH
INTERESTED PARTY
10. ROSEMARY NJERI MUCHERU....................................10
TH
INTERESTED PARTY
11. WILSON LAIBUNI GITUMA..........................................11
TH
INTERESTED PARTY
12. PETER WAMAI NYAGA...................................................12
TH
INTERESTED PARTY
(An application for joinder as Interested Parties and Injunction pending the hearing and
determination of this appeal, against the judgment orders of the High Court
at Thika (Mbugua, J.) delivered on 2
nd
May, 2019
in
ELC No 373 of 2017
*****************
RULING OF THE COURT
The Notice of motion dated 21
st
February 2020 is brought by
the
Interested Parties
seeking to be joined in the appeal and also seeking an injunction restraining
the respondent, M KN (Suing As Next
Friend of PKN (being a person of unsound mind)
whether by themselves as agents, servants, employees from demolishing, transferring, trespassing, excising, fencing or in any way interfering with the parcel of land known as
Ruiru East/Block x/xxx
(the subject land)
pending the hearing and determination of an appeal.
The application was brought on grounds that the Interested Parties are, and have been in active possession of the subject land, where they have been enjoying quiet possession since 2005. They also claim to have acquired share certificates for the respective parcels of the subject land that they occupy. They however claim that they did not participate in the proceedings in the Environment and Land Court despite the court having been notified of their presence on the subject land. They blame the disputing parties
ELC No 373 of
2017
for failure to notify them of the proceedings, that they are adversely affected by the trial court’s determination and they stand to suffer substantial irreparable loss should this Court decline to allow them to join in the appeal.
They further seek an injunction against the trial court’s orders for the reason that they have established a prima facie case with a chance of success as set out in
Giella vs Cassman Brown Co. Ltd
[1973] EA 358
.
Learned counsel for the Interested Parties,
Mr Musyoki
stated that they would rely on their written submissions in their entirety. Counsel also informed us that the Interested Parties would abandon the other prayers in the application including the prayer for an order of injunction.
On his part
Mr Thuo
, learned counsel for
the applicant, NM
N
informed us that the applicant would not be opposing the application for joinder. Though the respondent was served, there was no appearance, and neither did they file any written submissions.
Upon considering the application, the affidavit in support and the submissions, it is apparent that the Interested Parties are persons directly affected by the appeal in terms of
rule 77
of the Court’s rules, and having regard to the rules of natural justice, we consider that the interest of justice necessitates that they be joined in the appeal.
Accordingly, we allow the application to the extent that the 12 individuals named in the title be and are hereby joined in the appeal as Interested Parties. We direct that they be served with a copy of the appeal and other related documents. Costs in the appeal.
It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 7
th
day of May, 2021.
M. K. KOOME
..................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
P.O. KIAGE
...................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
A.K. MURGOR
...................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR