Case ID:173443
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
Alice Njambi Mutura v Principal Secretary, Ministry of Health & another [2021] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Petition E047 of 2020
Parties:
Alice Njambi Mutura v Principal Secretary, Ministry of Health & Attorney-General
Date Delivered:
09 Apr 2021
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
James Rika
Citation:
Alice Njambi Mutura v Principal Secretary, Ministry of Health & another [2021] eKLR
Court Division:
Employment and Labour Relations
County:
Nairobi
Case Outcome:
Preliminary Objection is rejected
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR
RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
PETITION NO. E047 OF 2020
BETWEEN
ALICE NJAMBI MUTURA...................................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
1. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH
2. THE HON. ATTORNEY- GENERAL..........................RESPONDENTS
RULING
1. The Petitioner filed her Petition on 19
th
September 2020. She was employed by the Ministry of Health on 10
th
January 1989 as a Nurse.
2. She received a letter dated 5
th
May 2017 from the 1
st
Respondent, alleging that she had not been on duty, since 3
rd
January 2017.
3. She explained that she was kept away by illness.
4. She received a letter from the 1
st
Respondent, dated 5
th
December 2017, dismissing her with effect from 3
rd
January 2017.
5. She filed this Petition seeking various declaratory orders under the Constitution of Kenya, and seeking in main, reinstatement.
6. The Respondents filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection, stating that the Petitioner’s cause of action is time-barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act, which places a time-bar of 3 years from the date of termination, on causes brought under contracts of employment regulated by the Employment Act 2007. It is submitted by the Respondents, that the Petition is an ordinary Claim, which is made as a Petition, with the intention of circumventing the time-bar, under Section 90 of the Employment Act.
The Court Finds
:
-
7. There is no agreement on relevant dates.
8. The Petitioner submits that the Petition was filed on 8
th
September 2020. The Respondent submits that the Petition was filed on 11
th
November 2020. The stamp of the Court on receiving the Petition, indicates the filing date as 19
th
September 2020.
9. The Petitioner states she received a letter dated 5
th
December 2017, dismissing her with effect from 3
rd
January 2017. She has not exhibited the letter of dismissal in her Petition.
10. If indeed she received the letter on 5
th
December 2017, her contract of employment would be deemed to have been terminated on the date she received communication about termination - 5
th
December 2017. It cannot have been January 2017. Termination does not take effect until the letter, or notice of termination is in the hands of the Employee. It cannot be retroactive. The Petitioner could not have taken any action in January 2017, without knowledge of the decision to terminate her contract.
11. The Respondents have not disputed the date their letter of dismissal was received by the Petitioner.
12. The Petition does not appear to the Court to be time-barred. The letter of dismissal having been received by the Petitioner in December 2017, the cause of action was alive and well on any date suggested to be the filing date- 8
th
September 2020, 19
th
September 2020 or even 11
th
November 2020.
IT IS ORDERED
: -
a. The Preliminary Objection is rejected.
b. Costs in the cause.
DATED AND SIGNED AT CHAKA, NYERI COUNTY, UNDER MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND JUDICIARY COVID-19 GUIDELINES, THIS 9
TH
DAY OF APRIL 2021
JAMES RIKA
JUDGE