Case ID:173082

Githinji Kimamo & Co. Advocates v Endmor Steel Millers Ltd [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Civil Case 86 of 2018

Parties:

Githinji Kimamo & Co. Advocates v Endmor Steel Millers Ltd

Date Delivered:

24 Mar 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Amraphael Mbogholi-Msagha

Citation:

Githinji Kimamo & Co. Advocates v Endmor Steel Millers Ltd [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Civil

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

CIVIL CASE NO. 86 OF 2018

GITHINJI KIMAMO & CO. ADVOCATES……………… APPLICANT

VERSUS

ENDMOR STEEL MILLERS LTD ………………………RESPONDENT

RULING

This is an advocate client dispute. In a case in the lower court involving the respondent and its employee, the applicant acted for the respondent until the matter was concluded. Subsequently, the applicant lodged a bill of costs against the respondent which was taxed at Kshs. 32,340/=.

There is a certificate of taxation dated 28

th

August, 2019. This bill has not been settled by the respondent hence the Notice of Motion dated 27

th

September and filed on 2

nd

October, 2019 seeking the order that judgment be entered in favour of the applicant against the respondent plus costs and interest.

The application is supported by grounds set out the face thereof alongside the affidavit of Hiram Thimba Advocate. The respondent opposed the application and filed grounds of opposition. The record shows that parties were inclined to settle the matter but having failed, the court has to make a decision.

The Certificate of Taxation has not been set aside or altered by way of any reference or review. The applicant is entitled to interest from the date the bill of costs was taxed.

The resistance of the order sought by the applicant finds no ground both in law and facts deponed in the affidavit in support of the Motion.

I am satisfied that the application is merited and accordingly allow the same as drawn.

Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 24

rd

Day of March, 2021.

A. MBOGHOLI MSAGHA

JUDGE