Case ID:171977

In re R (Child) [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Adoption Cause 77 of 2018

Parties:

In re R alias S (Child)

Date Delivered:

12 Mar 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Judgment

Judge(s):

Maureen Akinyi Odero

Citation:

In re R (Child) [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Family

County:

Nairobi

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

FAMILY DIVISION

ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 77 OF 2018

IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT NO. 8 OF 2001 AND THE ADOPTION RULES

AND

IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF BABY R alias ABANDONED

BABY BOY alias R (S) (THE CHILD)

AND

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION OF ADOPTION BY JGM and LNG

JUDGMENT

(1) Before this Court is the Originating Summons dated

28

th

March 2018

by which the Applicants seek the following orders:-

(i)

THAT

the Applicants JGM and LNG be and are hereby authorized to adopt BABY R alias B ABANDONED BABY R alias ABANDONED BABY B alias R (S) and the child be called SMG henceforth.

(ii)

THAT

SKW and DWW be and are hereby appointed LEGAL GUARDIANS of the child in the event a misfortune befalls the Applicants rendering them unavailable or incapable of taking care of the child.

(iii)

THAT

the REGISTRAR-GENERAL be and is hereby ordered to make the appropriate entries in the Adopted Children’s Register in respect of SMG.

(iv)

THAT

SMG was born in Kenya and is presumed to be a Kenyan citizen by birth and be entitled to a Kenyan Pass-port.”

(2) The Application was disposed by way of viva voce evidence and the parties appeared before the Court via the online platform on

5

th

February 2021

.

PW1

was the subject child I will consider his evidence later in this Judgment.

(3)

PW2

and

PW3

were the Applicants

JGM

and

LNG

. The Applicants are a couple who got married to each other under

Kikuyu Customary Laws

in the year

1986

. They later solemnized their union by way of a Church wedding on

21

st

November 1999

. The couple have not borne any child together. They told the Court that they are desirous of adopting a child in order to complete their family and to have someone to inherit their property.

(4) The Applicants stated that the subject child has been living with them at their farm in [particulars withheld] since the year

2012

. That their family members are aware of and support their intention to adopt the child. Both Applicants confirmed that they understood the legal implications of an Adoption order. They undertook to accord to the child all the rights and privileges due to a biological child including the right to inheritance.

(5)

PW4 GRACE EKAMBI

is an Officer from the

Little Angels Network

the Adoption Agency which declared the child Free for Adoption. The Agency filed its Report dated

19

th

September 2012

recommending the Adoption.

(6)

PW5 MARY ATATI

is a Principal Children’s Officer. She confirmed that the

Director Children’s Services

had filed the Report dated

19

th

February 2018

recommending the adoption.

ANALYSIS AND DETERMINATION

(7) I have considered the evidence adduced in open Court as well as the various Affidavits and Reports filed in this matter. The Preliminary requirements for the making of an Adoption Order are set out in

Section 156(1)

of the

Children’s Act

which provides as follows:-

“

159(1) No arrangement shall be commenced for the adoption of a child unless the child is at least six (6) weeks old and has been declared free for adoption by a Registered Adoption Society in accordance with the Rules prescribed in that behalf.”

(8) The subject child was born on

12

th

February 2010

. He is now

eleven (11) years old

way above the

six (6) week

age limit provided for in law. The

Little Angels Network

which is a Registered Adoption Agency have annexed to their report, the original copy of their Certificate Serial Number

[….]

dated

19

th

September 2012

declaring the subject-child Free for Adoption. As such I find that all the necessary requirements for an adoption order have been met.

(9) This Court is required to assess the suitability of the Applicants as Adoptive parents. The Applicants are a married couple both of whom are Kenyan citizens as proved by the copies of their National Identity Cards annexed to the Summons (Annextures

1(a)

and

1(b)

at

pages 7-8

). The couple got married under

Kikuyu Customary Law

in the year

1989

. Thereafter the couple solemnized their union on

21

st

November 1999

. This is proved by the copy of their Marriage Certificate Serial Number

[xxxx]

annexed at

page 9

of the Summons.

(10) The Applicants are both farmers and live on their farm near

[particulars withheld] Town

. From their farming activities the Applicants earn about Kshs

. 50,000/-

per month which is more than adequate to enable them provide for the needs of the child. Annexed at

page 26

of the Summons is a copy of the 1

st

Applicant’s Bank statement. Further vide the Supplementary Affidavit dated

1

st

July 2020

the 1

st

Applicant has annexed a copy of his Statement of Account from

[Particulars Withhheld] Sacco

(‘SUPP-1’)

whilst the 2

nd

Applicant has annexed a copy of her M-pesa statement

(‘SUPP-2’).

A perusal of the Applicant’s financial statements indicates that they are financially secure and have sufficient funds to provide for the needs of the child. It must be remembered that the Applicants also own approximately

8 acres

of very prime agricultural farmland in

Kigumo Nyeri County

; which is a very valuable asset.

(11) The Applicants told the Court that they are both Christians and intend to raise the child in the Christian faith. They state that the child has already been embraced by their respective families who view him as one of their own. The 2

nd

Applicants younger brother have accepted and his wife to be the Legal Guardian for the child. The Applicants are in good health. They have both annexed copies off their medical evaluations conducted by a

DR. KAMWATI

at Kigumo Sub-District Hospital on

8

th

July 2016

(pages

16-20

of Summons). They have annexed copies of their Certificates of Good Conduct issued by the

Kenya Police

proving that neither has a criminal record (Annexed at

pages 24-25

of the Summons). All in all I am satisfied that the Applicants are suitable adoptive parents.

(12) The subject child is a boy-child who was born on

12

th

February 2010

at the

Ruiru Sub-District Hospital

. He is now

eleven (11) years old

. The child’s biological mother whose name was given as

TW

absconded from the hospital after his birth thereby abandoning the child.

(13) The matter was reported at

Ruiru Police Station

vide OB Number

xx

of

xx

nd

March 2010

. Later the

Ruiru Children’s Court

committed the child to

Happy Life Children’s Home

for Care and Protection. On

23

rd

January 2013

the child was released to the custody of the Applicants under a Foster Care Agreement.

(14)

Article 14

of the

Constitution of Kenya, 2010

deals with the question of

Citizenship

.

Article 14(4)

provides as follows:-

“(4) A child found in Kenya who is, or appears to be, less than eight years of age and whose nationality and parents are not known, is presumed to be a citizen by birth.”

(15) The subject-child was abandoned shortly after his birth at the

Ruiru Sub-District Hospital

. He was then transferred to

Thika Level 5 Hospital

for initial nursing care. A letter dated

22

nd

February 2010

annexed to the Report field by the Adoption Agency from

Thika Level 5 Hospital

confirms this. Given that the child was born in the Republic of Kenya he is declared to be a Kenyan citizen by birth.

(16) The biological mother of the child whose name was given as

TW

abandoned the child at

Ruiru Sub-District Hospital

and apparently disappeared. Efforts to trace her did not bear any fruit. Neither did any person come forward to claim the baby. Annexed to the Summons at

page 27

is the original Police letter dated

22

nd

March 2010

. At

page 28

is the Final Police Letter dated

22

nd

September 2011

written by the Officer Commanding

Ruiru Police Station

indicating that efforts made by Police to trace the biological mother and/or relatives of the child have been unsuccessful.

(17) In deciding upon any matter involving a child Courts are obliged to give priority to the best interests of the said child.

Section 4(2)

of the

Children Act

provides:-

“(2) In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions,

Courts of Law

administrative authorities or legislative bodies,

the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration

.” [own emphasis]

(18) This is a child who was abandoned at birth. He faced an uncertain future in Children’s Homes and Institutions. This adoption affords the child the opportunity to be raised in a loving and secure home environment.

(19) The child has been living with the Applicants since

January 2013

. This is the only family he knows. The reports filed by the

Guardian ad Litem

and the

Director Children’s Services

indicate that the child has bonded well with the Applicants. They have enrolled him in school and provide for all his needs.

(20) I was able to interview the child online. He was a happy child who appeared healthy and well cared for. The child referred to the Applicants as his father and mother. He confirmed that he was in

Grade 4

at

[Particulars Withheld] School

.

(21) The Children’s officer conducted a home visit to the Applicants farm where they live with the child. The homestead was reported to be located in

Kigumo Town

, off

Gathugu Road

. The Applicants live in a three bed-roomed house which they have built on their

8 acre

farm. The environment was reported to be both safe and secure. The home is located close to

Kibichoi Police Station

. The home environment was found to be conducive for raising the child. In my own view it is certainly advantageous for the child to be raised in the countryside where he can interact closely with nature.

(22) From the material placed before this Court, I am satisfied that this adoption is certainly in the best interests of the child. They have appointed as Legal Guardians the 2

nd

Applicant’s brother

SKW

and his wife

DWW

. Both have signed a consent to act as Legal Guardians in the event the Applicants are unavailable or unable to care for the child (see consent at

page 11

of Summons).

(23) Accordingly I allow this application and I make the following orders:-

(a) The Applicants

JGM

and

LNG

are authorized to adopt the child known as

BABY

R

alias

BABY ABANDONED BABY R

alias

ABANDONED BABY B

alias

R

.

(b)

The child shall henceforth be known as

SMG.

(c) The child is declared to be a Kenyan citizen by birth.

(d)

SKW

and

DWW

are hereby appointed as legal guardians for the child in the event a misfortune befalls the Applicants rendering them unavailable or incapable of taking care of the child.

(e) The Registrar General is directed to make the relevant entry in the Adopted Children’s Register.

(f) No orders on costs.

DATED IN NAIROBI THIS 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021.

…………………………………..

MAUREEN A. ODERO

JUDGE