Case ID:171605
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
In re Estate of M’Mwamba M’Munyua (Deceased) [2021] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Succession Cause 29 of 2006
Parties:
In re Estate of M’Mwamba M’Munyua (Deceased)
Date Delivered:
04 Mar 2021
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
High Court at Meru
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Thripsisa Wanjiku Cherere
Citation:
In re Estate of M’Mwamba M’Munyua (Deceased) [2021] eKLR
Court Division:
Civil
County:
Meru
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
(CORAM: CHERERE-J)
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 29 OF 2006
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF M’MWAMBA M’MUNYUA (DECEASED)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF PROTEST
BETWEEN
SAVERA KATHURE....................................................1
ST
PROTESTOR/APPLICANT
STANLEY GATOBU RITHARA................................2
ND
PROTESTOR/APPLICANT
AND
CATHERINE KATHURE MWAMBA...........1
ST
ADMINISTRATOR/RESPONDENT
CHARITY NGUGI MWAMBA......................2
ND
ADMINISTRATOR/RESPONDENT
GRACE KIENDE MWAMBA......................3
RD
ADMINISTRATOR/RESPONDENT
RULING
Introduction
1.
M’MWAMBA M’MUNYUA
(Deceased)
died sometimes on 12
th
November,1985. His estate comprises of
LR.NO.
ABOTHUGUCHI/GITIE/183
measuring 1.3 Ha.
2. According to the chief’s letter dated 25
th
November, 2005, the deceased’s wife was deceased and he was survived by 4 children:
1) Mark Marocho Mwamba - Son
2) Catherine Kathure Mwamba - Daughter
3) Charity Ngugi Mwamba - Daughter
4) Grace Kiende Mwamba - Daughter
3. Letters of Administration were issued to
Mark Marocho Mwamba
on 21
st
February,2011. Subsequently, a Certificate of Confirmation of Grant was issued on 21
st
September, 2011 distributing the estate as follows:
i. Stanley Gatobu Rithara (purchaser) - 1 acre
ii. Mark Marocho Mwamba- Balance
4. Mark Marocho Mwamba (
Administrator
) died on 31
st
October, 2013 and was substituted with Catherine Kathure Mwamba, Charity Ngugi Mwamba and Grace Kiende Mwamba as joint administrators by letters of administration dated 27
th
February, 2018.
5. By summons for confirmation dated 22
nd
August, 2019, the joint administrators sought orders that:
1) Letters of Administration issued on 06
th
November, 2018 be confirmed
2) Title to LR. NO. ABOTHUGUCHI/GITIE/183 be reverted to the name of M’MWAMBA M’MUNYUA (DECEASED)
Protestors’/Applicants’ Case
6.
SAVERA KATHURE (
1
st
Protestor/Applicant
)
by her affidavit of protest sworn on 24
th
September, 2019 filed on even date asserted that she was wife to the late Mark Marocho Mwamba (
deceased’s
son)
with whom they were blessed with a child IREEN NKATHA and that her husband’s share from deceased’s estate ought to be distributed to her to hold in trust for the child. She denied that she had remarried.
7.
STANLEY GATOBU RITHARA (2
nd
Protestor/Applicant
)
by his affidavit of protest sworn on 24
th
September, 2019 filed on even date asserted that he bought 1 acre of deceased’s land from the late Mark Marocho Mwamba (
deceased’s son)
for Kshs. 120,000/- to facilitate the filing of this cause. Annexed to the affidavit is a sale agreement dated 24
th
January, 2006 between him and Mark Marocho Mwamba (
deceased’s
son
) and two acknowledgement receipts for Kshs. 120,000/- and Kshs. 29,151.20 dated 30
th
January,2006 and 13
th
February, 2006 respectively.
Administrators’/Respondents’ Case
8. The 1st administrator by her affidavits sworn on 11th November,2019 asserts that her signature and those of her co-Administrators appearing on the consent to mode of distribution dated 10
th
August, 2011 were forged. It is also submitted that the Administrators who are daughters of the deceased were not party to the sale agreement and further that the 1
st
Protestor/Applicant is not entitled to the estate for the reason that she left her matrimonial home and remarried after the death of husband.
Analysis and Determination
9. I have considered the affidavit evidence on record and submissions for the Administrators and the Protestors. The gravamen of this Protest revolves around distribution of
LR.NO. ABOTHUGUCHI/GITIE/183
and the issue for determination is who among the parties is entitled to benefit from the deceased’s estate.
10. Concerning the Administrators, there is uncontroverted evidence that the deceased was survived by a son and three daughters. The son has since died and is survived by the 1
st
Protestor and a child IREEN NKATHA.
11. The Administrators who were daughters of the deceased, claim that they did not participate in the distribution of their father’s estate, that their signatures were forged and finally that they did not consent to the disposal of part of the estate to the 2
nd
Respondent. Unfortunately, the matter is somehow complicated for the reason that the claims are made against their brother who is since deceased.
12. I have considered the consent that the Administrators deny signing and I find that a consent that purportedly disinherits beneficiaries of their legal entitlement cannot be taken lightly and this court is justified in concluding that the Administrators were discriminated against on the basis of their gender as daughters of the deceased.
13. In relation to the 1
st
Protestor, there is no dispute that she was married to the late Mark Marocho Mwamba (
deceased’s son)
with whom they were blessed with a child IREEN NKATHA.
14. Section 35 of the Law of Succession Act provides that;
Where intestate has left one surviving spouse and child or children
(1) Subject to the provisions of section 40, where an intestate has left one surviving spouse and a child or children, the surviving spouse shall be entitled to—
(a) the personal and household effects of the deceased absolutely;
and
(b) a life interest in the whole residue of the net intestate estate: Provided that, if the surviving spouse is a widow, that interest shall determine upon her
re-marriage to any person
.
15. The 1
st
Administrator’s assertion that the 1
st
Protestor has remarried was not proved on a balance of probability or at all and I therefore find that she like IREEN NKATHA are entitled to benefit from the deceased’s estate as wife and daughter of late Mark Marocho Mwamba (
deceased’s son)
.
16. With reference to the 2
nd
Protestor, the sale agreement and acknowledgment receipts he produced
primafacie
demonstrate that the late Mark Marocho Mwamba (
deceased’s son)
received for Kshs. 149,151/- for sale of one acre of deceased’s land.
17. Section 45 of the Law of Succession Act (
the Act)
provides as follows:
(1) Except so far as expressly authorized by this Act, or by any other written law, or by a grant of representation under this Act, no person shall, for any purpose, take possession or dispose of, or otherwise intermeddle with, any free property of a deceased person.
18. The primary function of a probate court is distribution of the estate of a dead person. (See
In
Re Estate of G K K (Deceased) [2017] eKLR
)
:
19. Since the claim by the 2
nd
Protestor is that of a purchaser and is based on a sale of land agreement with the son of the deceased, the agreement was done after the death of the deceased and before confirmation of the grant herein. Such purchaser is not a beneficiary of the estate and should not be entertained in a succession cause. As such, his claim cannot be litigated in this succession cause. Given the circumstances of the case and the fact that the sale of the land violated Section 45 of
the
Act
, this court cannot aid him in enforcing an unlawful transaction. For purposes of directing the interested parties, it suffices to cite Musyoka J
In re Estate of Stone Kathuli Muinde (Deceased) [2016] eKLR
that:
“Such claims to ownership of alleged estate property, as between the estate and a third party, should be resolved through the civil process in a civil suit properly brought before a civil court in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Procedure Act and the Civil Procedure Rules. This could mean filing suit at the magistrates’ courts, or at the Civil or Commercial Divisions of the High Court, or at the Environment and Land Court. If a decree is obtained in such suit in favour of the claimant, then such decree should be presented to the probate court in the succession cause so that that court can give effect to it.”
20. Applying the above legal test, the protest by the 2
nd
Protestor fails and is dismissed.
21. Section
38
of the
Act
provides that:
Where an intestate has left a surviving child or children but no spouse, the net intestate estate shall, subject to the provisions of sections 41 and 42,
devolve upon the surviving child, if there be only
one, or shall be equally divided among the surviving children
(Emphasis added)
22. Consequently, I find that all the 4 children of the deceased are entitled to equality of inheritance of their father’s estate and the proposal made by the 1
st
Administrator assigning a bigger share of the estate to herself is therefore rejected.
23. From the foregoing analysis, it is hereby ordered:
1) Any partition and resultant titles arising from LR.NO. ABOTHUGUCHI/GITIE/183 are cancelled and it is directed that the same be reverted to the name of M’MWAMBA M’MUNYUA
(Deceased).
2) LR.NO. ABOTHUGUCHI/GITIE/183 is distributed as follows:
i. ¼ share to Catherine Kathure Mwamba
ii. ¼ share to Charity Ngugi Mwamba
iii. ¼ share to Grace Kiende Mwamba
iv. ¼ share for Mark Marocho Mwamba (deceased) to SAVERA KATHURE for life and upon determination of her life interest to
IREEN NKATHA
DATED AT MERU THIS
04
th
DAY OF
March
2021
T. W. CHERERE
JUDGE
Court Assistant - Morris Kinoti
For Applicant - Mr. Muthomi for John Muthomi & Co. Advocates
1st Administrator - In person
2nd Administrator - In person
3rd Administrator - In person