Case ID:171244

In re Estate of Silas Muigai Gichombo (Deceased) [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Succession Cause 1903 of 2015

Parties:

In re Estate of Silas Muigai Gichombo (Deceased)

Date Delivered:

15 Feb 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Aggrey Otsyula Muchelule

Citation:

In re Estate of Silas Muigai Gichombo (Deceased) [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Family

County:

Nairobi

Case Outcome:

Application allowed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

MILIMANI LAW COURTS

FAMILY DIVISION

SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 1903 OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF SILAS MUIGAI GICHOMBO (DECEASED)

LUCIA MUTHONI SILAS......................................................APPLICANT

VERSUS

JAMES MITHIA GICHOMBO......................................1

ST

OBJECTOR

GOERGE GICHOMBO MUIGAI.................................2

ND

OBJECTOR

RULING

1. The application seeking the rectification of a grant or certificate of

confirmation is very limited in its scope. Under

section 74

of the

Law of Succession Act (Cap 160)

, errors on grants of representation may be rectified by the court. It provides that:-

“Errors in names and descriptions, or in setting fourth the time and place of the deceased's death, or the purpose in a limited grant, may be rectified by the court, and the grant of representation, whether before or after confirmation, may be altered and amended accordingly.”

2.

Rule 43(1)

of the

Probate and Administration Rules

provides that:-

“(1) Where the holder of a grant seeks pursuant to the provisions of section 74 of the Act rectification of an error in the grant as to the names or descriptions of any person

or thing or as to the time or place of the death of the deceased or, in the case of a limited grant, the purpose for which the grant was made, he shall apply by summons in Form 110 for such rectification through the registry and in the cause in which the grant was issued.”

3. The court in

In the Matter of the Estate of Geoffrey Kinuthia Nyamwinga (Deceased) [20131eKLR

noted that the power to order rectification under

section 74

of the

Act

and

rule 43(1)

of the

Rules

is limited to correction of errors relating to names or descriptions or setting out of the time or place of the deceased's death.

4. In the instant case, the deceased Silas Muigai Gichombo died intestate on 10

th

March 2001. He was survived by his widow Lucia Muthoni Silas (the applicant) and eight children who included the objectors James Mithia Gichombo and George Gichombo Muigai. He left an estate comprising parcels of land and shares in limited liability companies. The initial grant was issued jointly to the applicant and one of her daughters, the late Agnes Njeri Muigai. This was in Kiambu

Succession Cause No. 190 of 2007

. It was subsequently revoked and a fresh grant issued in the names of the applicant and the 2

nd

objector. On 15

th

August 2016 the applicant applied for the confirmation of the grant. She proposed how she wanted the estate of the deceased to be distributed to the beneficiaries. The objectors and their brother Dennis Thuo Muigai were opposed to the proposed mode. The 2

nd

objector filed a protest. The court referred the matter to mediation by

elders. The elders affirmed the applicant's proposal. All beneficiaries signed. However, the objectors later disowned the consent. The

objectors filed their objection and protest to the distribution. Justice Ali-Aroni heard the dispute in which the applicant and the rest of her family were on one side and her three sons (the objectors and Dennis Thuo Muigai) were on the other side. The court agreed with the distribution proposed by the widow, except for LR Gatamaiyu/Kagwe/193 and LR Gatamaiyu/Kagwe/T.215/32 in respect of which it was indicated how it would be shared. A certificate of confirmation was issued.

5. The 1

st

objector was dissatisfied with the distribution and has lodged

Civil Appeal No. COACA/E428/2020

to the Court of Appeal. He has also filed an application before that court seeking the stay of the orders of this Court. The appeal and application have not been heard.

6. In the present application dated 7

th

October 2020 under

section 74

of the

Act

, the applicant seeks the rectification of the names of four of the beneficiaries and also the name of the deceased. She stated that she realised that the names had errors which needed to be rectified to enable the implementation of the certificate of confirmation. She wants the name of the deceased to be rectified to read Silas Muigai Gichombo alias Silas Muigai alias Muigai Gichombo, her name to be Luica Muthoni Silas instead of Lucia Muthoni Gichombo, the name of George Gichombo Silas to be George Gichombo Muigai and Kennedy Muigai to be Kennedy Muigai Wanjiku.

7. The 1

st

objector filed replying affidavit to oppose the application. One, he said that because of the appeal and application at the Court of Appeal this court is

functus officio

. Secondly, in view of the appeal there is likelihood to have the decision of this court conflict with that of the Court of Appeal. Thirdly, in view of the maters in the Court of Appeal this court should stay its proceedings.

8. This court is the one that issued the judgment that led to the issuance of the certificate of confirmation in which the estate of the deceased has been distributed to the beneficiaries, who include the objectors. Under

section 74

of the

Act

and

rule 43(1)

of the

Rules

this court has power to order rectification of the certificate of confirmation in the manner proposed by the applicant. The court is not

functus officio

.

9. Further, there is no stay of the judgment and decree that has been issued either by this court or the Court of Appeal. Until there is stay, the applicant has the right and obligation to distribute the estate of the deceased as ordered by the certificate of confirmation.

10. Lastly, the objectors have no issue with the substance of the application. They have no issue with the correction of the names in the certificate of confirmation. There is no intention on the part of the applicant to rearrange the distribution, or to remove or add the beneficiaries.

11. As a result, I allow the application with costs.

DATED and DELIVERED NAIROBI this 15

TH

day of FEBRUARY 2021.

A.O. MUCHELULE

JUDGE