Case ID:171208

Mbiti v Mwilu & another; Attorney General & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Constitutional Petition E002 of 2021) [2021] KEHC 8952 (KLR) (15 February 2021) (Ruling)

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Constitutional Petition E002 of 2021

Parties:

Mbiti v Mwilu & another; Attorney General & 2 others (Interested Parties)

Date Delivered:

15 Feb 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Meru

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Patrick J. Okwaro Otieno

Citation:

Mbiti v Mwilu & another; Attorney General & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Constitutional Petition E002 of 2021) [2021] KEHC 8952 (KLR) (15 February 2021) (Ruling)

Court Division:

Civil

County:

Meru

Case Outcome:

Petition ordered

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

Mbiti v Mwilu & another; Attorney General & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Constitutional Petition E002 of 2021) [2021] KEHC 8952 (KLR) (15 February 2021) (Ruling)

Mwongela Isaiah Mbiti v Philomena Mbete Mwilu & another; Attorney General & 2 others (Interested Parties) [2021] eKLR

Neutral citation:

[2021] KEHC 8952 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Meru

Constitutional Petition E002 of 2021

PJO Otieno, J

February 15, 2021

Between

Mwongela Isaiah Mbiti

Petitioner

and

Hon Lady Justice Philomena Mbete Mwilu

1

st

Respondent

The Judicial Service Commission

2

nd

Respondent

and

Attorney General

Interested Party

Director Of Public Prosecutions

Interested Party

Director Of Criminal Investigations

Interested Party

Ruling

1.

Having disclosed my association with Kituo Cha Sharia as a member of its Annual General Meeting, none of the counsel parties have expressed any reservation about my inability to deal with this matter impartially and judiciously. In those circumstances, I find no reason to recuse myself as I am able to follow my conscience and belief notions of justice, fairness and the rule of law.

2.

With concurrence of the parties, I shall hear the matter unless there be any reason to justify otherwise.

3.

On the request by counsel for the 1

st

respondent that the interim stay of the interim conservatory orders be extended, I am indeed minded to maintain the litigation field even and level. I direct that the position prevailing as of today, when the file was first called out, be maintained. That advices that the stay order be extended till the 4.3.2021.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021

PATRICK J O OTIENO

JUDGE