Case ID:171207
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
In re Estate of the Late Mary Nangila Mulongo - (Deceased) [2020] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Succession Cause 145 of 2009
Parties:
In re Estate of the Late Mary Nangila Mulongo - (Deceased)
Date Delivered:
21 Oct 2020
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
High Court at Kitale
Case Action:
Directions
Judge(s):
Hilary Kiplagat Chemitei
Citation:
In re Estate of the Late Mary Nangila Mulongo - (Deceased) [2020] eKLR
Advocates:
Mr. Wanyonyi for the Objector
Mr. Wafula for the Petitioner
Court Division:
Family
County:
Trans Nzoia
Advocates:
Mr. Wanyonyi for the Objector
Mr. Wafula for the Petitioner
History Advocates:
Both Parties Represented
Case Outcome:
Application allowed
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KITALE
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 145 OF 2009
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE MARY NANGILA MULONGO - (DECEASED)
ANNAH OBWOYO MAKOKHA..................................................1
ST
RESPONDENT
ROSE MUNIALO...........................................................................2
ND
RESPONDENT
VERSES
SHADRACK WANJALA WEKESA& 3 OTHERS.......OBJECTORS/APPLICANTS
DIRECTIONS
1. This matter was scheduled for a ruling in respect to a summons for revocation of grant application dated
16
th
December 2019
. The court has perused the same and its supporting affidavit sworn by the Applicant and the attendant annexures.
2. The court has perused also the replying affidavit of
Anna Makokha
, the 1
st
Respondent dated 10
th
March 2020. At the same time the court has perused the parties’ submissions on record.
3. This court is of the considered opinion that the objection proceedings cannot be effectively disposed by way of affidavit evidence. This is for the simple reason that the matter involved a larger part of the party’s families. More importantly there are other proceedings in respect to the estate of the late
PENINA NAFULA CHANGA
, namely
Succession cause No.139 of 1999
which it appears gave rise to this cause. Evidence may be required to be adduced from the said cause affecting the parties herein.
4. The affidavits on record as they are, may not bring out the essential historical facts and thus there is need to have
viva voce
evidence adduced. This should give all the parties a good level playing field.
5. Consequently, the application dated 16
th
December 2019 be heard by way of oral evidence. The Applicants shall be the Plaintiffs and the Respondents the Defendants. Parties be at liberty to file and exchange further affidavits and statements, if any, within the next 14 days from the date herein.
6. Costs shall await the outcome of the cause.
Dated, Signed and delivered at Kitale this 21
st
day of October, 2020.
_________________
H. K. CHEMITEI
JUDGE
21/10/2020
In the presence of:-
Mr. Wanyonyi for the Objector
Mr. Wafula for the Petitioner
Court Assistant – Kirong
Directions given in open court.