Case ID:171189

Bridge International Academies v Dennis Khasamba Ogesa [2019] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Civil Suit 1 of 2018

Parties:

Bridge International Academies v Dennis Khasamba Ogesa

Date Delivered:

13 Dec 2019

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Malindi

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Reuben Nyambati Nyakundi

Citation:

Bridge International Academies v Dennis Khasamba Ogesa [2019] eKLR

Court Division:

Civil

County:

Kilifi

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT MALINDI

CIVIL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2018

BRIDGE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIES.......................................PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT

VERSUS

DENNIS KHASAMBA OGESA..............................................................DEFENDANT/APPLICANT

CORAM: Hon. Justice R. Nyakundi

Mungai Victor Kimani for the Plaintiff/Respondent

Mwaure & Mwaure Waihiga for the Defendant/Applicant

RULING

This is an application brought under Order 9 Rule 13 (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking the following orders:

(a). That Mwaure & Mwaure Waihiga Advocates have ceased to be the Advocates for the defendant in this suit.

(b). That costs to be in the cause.

The grounds upon which this application is premised are set out as follows:

(1). That the defendant herein has been un-co-operative with his advocates on record and this has made it extremely difficult to represent the client.

(2). That there are no proper, precise or appropriate instructions for the advocate to proceed with the matter given the current relationship between the Advocate and the client.

The respondent was duly served with the application but as at the time of canvassing it, there was no opposition to it.

Determination

The right to instruct legal counsel is provided for under Article 50 (2) (G) of the Constitution on a right to a fair hearing. Once the instructions are issued to an Advocate by a client to retain his or her services it is a matter of privity of contract which governs the relationship.

It is evident here from the applicant that in particular to this retainer, the applicant firm has demonstrated lack of co-operation of instructions from the respondent to continue offering professional legal services.

In applying the provisions of Order 9 Rule 13 (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the reason is plain enough, a notice to cease acting and to withdraw legal services has been brought to the attention of the respondent. Having been made acutely aware he seems not to be bothered in any other way by filing any objection to the application.

I therefore conclude that on the basis of the reasons given an order to discharge the firm of

Mwaure & Mwaure Waihiga Advocate

from representing the respondent be allowed.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MALINDI THIS 31

ST

DAY OF DECEMBER 2019

..........................

R. NYAKUNDI

JUDGE

In the presence of

1. Ms. Marubu for the applicant