Case ID:169938

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Wilfred Olooko Muroka v Nzoia Sugar Company Limited [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Cause 47 of 2018

Parties:

Wilfred Olooko Muroka v Nzoia Sugar Company Limited

Date Delivered:

11 Feb 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Bungoma

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Mathews Nderi Nduma

Citation:

Wilfred Olooko Muroka v Nzoia Sugar Company Limited [2021] eKLR

Advocates:

M/s J.O. Makal Advocate for the Respondent

Court Division:

Employment and Labour Relations

County:

Bungoma

Advocates:

M/s J.O. Makal Advocate for the Respondent

History Advocates:

One party or some parties represented

Case Outcome:

Application dismissed.

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT

AT BUNGOMA

CAUSE NO. 47 OF 2018

WILFRED OLOOKO MUROKA................................................................CLAIMANT

VERSUS

NZOIA SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED................................................RESPONDENT

RULING

1. The applicant filed application dated 14/10/2019 on the even date praying for an Order that;

(a)

The

Honourable Court be pleased to review, vary and or set aside its judgment dated 26/9/2019 in Cause No. 47 of 2008.

2. The application is premised on the following grounds:-

(a) That there are errors apparent on the face of the record in the judgment listed in paragraphs 2 to 7 thereof.

3. The application was opposed by a replying affidavit deposed to by the legal officer of the Respondent M/s Ritah N. Mukhongo.

4. The deponent states that the application is a gross abuse of the process of the Court in that the applicant having been dissatisfied with the judgment of the Court ought to have filed an Appeal at the Court of Appeal but not to invite the Court to revisit its decision on factual matters set out in the judgment.

5. That the application does not meet the criteria set out in Rule 33(1) (a) to (d) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016.

6. That indeed the Court made a proper evaluation of facts presented and rendered an appropriate judgment which is subject for appeal before the Court of Appeal.

7. The Court has considered all the matters raised by the applicant and is satisfied they are all matters that may be properly raised before the Court of Appeal but not before the trial judge.

8. The trial Court is now

functus officio

and cannot reconsider its findings of law and fact made in its judgment.

9. The application clearly lacks merit and is dismissed.

Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 11

th

day of February, 2021.

MATHEWS N. NDUMA

JUDGE

ORDER

In view of the declaration of measures restricting court of operations due to the COVID-19 pandemic and in light of the directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice on 15

th

March 2020, this ruling has been delivered to the parties online with their consent. They have waived compliance with

Order 21 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules

which requires that all judgments and rulings be pronounced in open court. In permitting this course, this court has been guided by

Article 159(2)(d)

of the Constitution which requires the court to eschew undue technicalities in delivering justice, the right of access to justice guaranteed to every person under

Article 48

of the Constitution and the provisions of

Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act (chapter 21 of the Laws of Kenya)

which impose on this court the duty of the court,

inter alia

, to use suitable technology to enhance the overriding objective which is to facilitate just, expeditious, proportionate and affordable resolution of civil disputes.

MATHEWS N. NDUMA

JUDGE

Appearances

Applicant in person

M/s J.O. Makal Advocate for the respondent

Chrispo: Court clerk

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Cause 47 of 2018', 'Parties:': 'Wilfred Olooko Muroka v Nzoia Sugar Company Limited', 'Date Delivered:': '11 Feb 2021', 'Case Class:': 'Civil', 'Court:': 'Employment and Labour Relations Court at Bungoma', 'Case Action:': 'Ruling', 'Judge(s):': 'Mathews Nderi Nduma', 'Citation:': 'Wilfred Olooko Muroka v Nzoia Sugar Company Limited [2021] eKLR', 'Advocates:': 'M/s J.O. Makal Advocate for the Respondent', 'Court Division:': 'Employment and Labour Relations', 'County:': 'Bungoma', 'History Advocates:': 'One party or some parties represented', 'Case Outcome:': 'Application dismissed.', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}