Case ID:169938
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
Wilfred Olooko Muroka v Nzoia Sugar Company Limited [2021] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Cause 47 of 2018
Parties:
Wilfred Olooko Muroka v Nzoia Sugar Company Limited
Date Delivered:
11 Feb 2021
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Bungoma
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Mathews Nderi Nduma
Citation:
Wilfred Olooko Muroka v Nzoia Sugar Company Limited [2021] eKLR
Advocates:
M/s J.O. Makal Advocate for the Respondent
Court Division:
Employment and Labour Relations
County:
Bungoma
Advocates:
M/s J.O. Makal Advocate for the Respondent
History Advocates:
One party or some parties represented
Case Outcome:
Application dismissed.
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT BUNGOMA
CAUSE NO. 47 OF 2018
WILFRED OLOOKO MUROKA................................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
NZOIA SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The applicant filed application dated 14/10/2019 on the even date praying for an Order that;
(a)
The
Honourable Court be pleased to review, vary and or set aside its judgment dated 26/9/2019 in Cause No. 47 of 2008.
2. The application is premised on the following grounds:-
(a) That there are errors apparent on the face of the record in the judgment listed in paragraphs 2 to 7 thereof.
3. The application was opposed by a replying affidavit deposed to by the legal officer of the Respondent M/s Ritah N. Mukhongo.
4. The deponent states that the application is a gross abuse of the process of the Court in that the applicant having been dissatisfied with the judgment of the Court ought to have filed an Appeal at the Court of Appeal but not to invite the Court to revisit its decision on factual matters set out in the judgment.
5. That the application does not meet the criteria set out in Rule 33(1) (a) to (d) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016.
6. That indeed the Court made a proper evaluation of facts presented and rendered an appropriate judgment which is subject for appeal before the Court of Appeal.
7. The Court has considered all the matters raised by the applicant and is satisfied they are all matters that may be properly raised before the Court of Appeal but not before the trial judge.
8. The trial Court is now
functus officio
and cannot reconsider its findings of law and fact made in its judgment.
9. The application clearly lacks merit and is dismissed.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 11
th
day of February, 2021.
MATHEWS N. NDUMA
JUDGE
ORDER
In view of the declaration of measures restricting court of operations due to the COVID-19 pandemic and in light of the directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice on 15
th
March 2020, this ruling has been delivered to the parties online with their consent. They have waived compliance with
Order 21 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules
which requires that all judgments and rulings be pronounced in open court. In permitting this course, this court has been guided by
Article 159(2)(d)
of the Constitution which requires the court to eschew undue technicalities in delivering justice, the right of access to justice guaranteed to every person under
Article 48
of the Constitution and the provisions of
Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act (chapter 21 of the Laws of Kenya)
which impose on this court the duty of the court,
inter alia
, to use suitable technology to enhance the overriding objective which is to facilitate just, expeditious, proportionate and affordable resolution of civil disputes.
MATHEWS N. NDUMA
JUDGE
Appearances
Applicant in person
M/s J.O. Makal Advocate for the respondent
Chrispo: Court clerk