Case ID:169933
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
Mary Acheing Deya Okong’o & another v Joseph Obuge Ongota & another [2021] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Environment and Land Case 673 of 2015
Parties:
Mary Acheing Deya Okong’o & Corner Omondi Oduorv Joseph Obuge Ongota & County Land Registrar, Kisumu County
Date Delivered:
04 Feb 2021
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Antony Ombwayo
Citation:
Mary Acheing Deya Okong’o & another v Joseph Obuge Ongota & another [2021] eKLR
Court Division:
Environment and Land
County:
Kisumu
Case Outcome:
Application allowed.
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT KISUMU
ELC CASE NO. 673 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER AFFECTING THE RIGHTS FO THE HEIRS TO THE ESTATE OF PETER DEYA GUMBA
AND
IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE HEIRS OF PETER DEYA GUMBA
BETWEEN
MARY ACHEING DEYA OKONG’O..................................................................1
ST
PLAINTIFF
CORNER OMONDI ODUOR...............................................................................2
ND
PLAINTIFF
-VERSUS-
JOSEPH OBUGE ONGOTA.............................................................................1
ST
DEFENDANT
THE COUNTY LAND REGISTRAR, KISUMU COUNTY..........................2
ND
DEFENDANT
RULING
Mary Achieng Deya Okong’o and Corner Omondi Oduor have come to this court against Joseph Obuge Ongota and the County Land Registrar seeking orders that the court sets aside orders issued on 16/12/2020 dismissing the application dated 20/1/2020 for non-attendance. That the court be pleased to reinstate the application dated 28/1/2020 for prosecution to its logical conclusion.
The is based on the grounds that the applicant filed an application for stay of taxation of the bill of costs dated 30
th
January 2020 before this court on 28
th
January 2020. The matter was then fixed for inter parties hearing on 12
th
February 2020 a date in which the matter did not proceed and it was adjourned to 16
th
December 2020.
The matter was then set down for hearing on 16
th
December 202 a date in which the Applicant did not attend since he was bitten by a snake which forced him to be rushed to the hospital. The Applicant came to realise later that the after he recovered and went to enquire with the Registry staffs of what transpired that his matter was dismissed for nonattendance.
The applicant has demonstrated sufficient interest in prosecuting the matter to warrant reinstatement of the matter before court. This application should be granted to meet the ends of justice. The respondent has not seriously challenged the allegations by the applicant as he has not filed a replying affidavit.
I do find that the applicant has shown sufficient cause for failing to attend court for the prosecution of the application dated 28
th
January 2020 and therefore I do grant the orders prayed namely that the orders issued on 16/12/2020 are set aside and the application dated 28/1/2020 is hereby reinstated. Costs in the cause.
DATED AT KISUMU THIS 4
TH
DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
ANTONY OMBWAYO
JUDGE
This Ruling has been delivered to the parties by electronic mail due to measures restricting court operations due to the COVID-19 pandemic and in the light of the directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice on 15
th
March 2019.
ANTONY OMBWAYO
JUDGE